Answer:
Explanation:
Rakesh followed up on his best therapeutic understanding and confined his patient's eating routine - just this time his patient is his father. One of Desai's objectives is to address where moral limits lie in connection to applying Western logical standards to customary social circumstances: Ought to Rakesh have treated his father, surprisingly, similar to a patient? Would Rakesh have been abusing restorative morals on the off chance that he didn't have any significant bearing exacting standards to his father similarly he did to his different patients?
Two things occured because of Rakesh's limitations on his father's eating regimen. In any event one of these things likewise caused the change that overwhelmed Rakesh's character. One thing is that his rural community raised spouse selfishly and ungenerously enjoyed denying and depriving her father in-law of things he needed. The other is that the father bribed Rakesh's kids to get him the things he needed that Rakesh kept him from having. At the point when Rakesh found the deceit and the misleading, he was maddened, as any parent may be. He not just chided his father in the harshest terms- - something he had never done - he developed the confinements on and expanded the supervision of his eating routine.
The inquiry is raised regarding whether Rakesh's displeasure was supported; regardless of whether it had consistently been a piece of his character however not demonstrated in light of the fact that his father had never prompted it; was on the grounds that he esteemed his father a substandard and ruining impact. The story closes with a greater number of inquiries than it began with. Truth be told, there is an inquiry raised about the way of life that energizes such carefully characterized and communicated jobs that can be so ruinous when turned around or meddled with.
Obstacles on life’s journey
Hope this helps
Well the title of the book is “Pride and Prejudice”. The pride referring to Darcy and the prejudice referring to Elizabeth. Through the book, the two begin to overcome those obstacles and learn to love one another. Darcy became more humbled, while Elizabeth became less judgmental.
If you mean “is the statement correct?” kinda thing, then i believe you can’t speak french. you may be able to speak a little bit of french, but i don’t think you’ll be able to speak french fluently.
This question is about "the storm" by Kate Chopin
Answer Explanation:
1. Calixta is happy at the end of the story because her son and her husband arrive home safely, even in the face of the storm, besides, she does not feel any remorse for the adultery she committed.
2. Everyone is happy because she has a family that was not destroyed by her actions, and they know that adultery is impossible to be discovered, so their lives, as they are used to, will be maintained.
3. Reading the short story, we have the impression that the author does not encourage adultery, but does not see it as something capable of destroying a family and ruining the marriage, but rather as something that can be kept secret, without hurting anyone.
4. The only moral tone that can be considered in this story is that people should do what they want and make them happy regardless of the rules established by society.
