Answer:
elected members of the House adhere to the requests of their constituents more closely than the members of the Senate have.
Explanation:
According to my research on Senate term time-frames, I can say that based on the information provided within the question he framers of the constitution were most likely intending that elected members of the House adhere to the requests of their constituents more closely than the members of the Senate have.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: To analyze it deeper.
Explanation:
Just explode your facts and rewrite it in your own words
Answer:
The correct answer is option B "National Labor Relations"
Explanation:
More than 33% of private area businesses (various guidelines apply in the open division) as of late reviewed confessed to having explicit standards forbidding workers from examining their compensation with coworkers.2' interestingly, just around 1 out of 14 bosses have effectively embraced a "pay transparency" policy. Around fifty-one percent of the businesses studied expressed that they didn't have a particular arrangement in regards to pay mystery or 21 confidentiality issues. Survey information additionally propose that chiefs are commonly inclined to24 PSC rules. A predictable finding in inquire about going back to the 1970s is that a huge extent of directors concur with the utilization of PSC (pay secrecy and confidentiality) rules. Available information along these lines seems to recommend that a noteworthy number of managers have either an inclination for, or have really established explicit PSC rules. To put it plainly, it's anything but an exaggeration to propose that businesses seem to lean toward pay mystery and secrecy.
What makes the predominance of these standards so intriguing is the way that they have been reliably seen as unlawful under the National Labor Relations Acts.
Answer:
Girls and Women
Explanation:
Girls and Women who play sports have higher levels of confidence and self-esteem and lower levels of depression.
Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
