They did it by <span>revolutionizing U.S. banking, monetary, and tax structures. If it hadn't been for that, the fight in the war would have been much more difficult since the south was really wealthy due to the slave working plantations which didn't have any losses or similar things since they didn't pay workers as they were slaves.</span>
The best explanation why the area between Spain and Gaul was not part of the Roman empire until that later period was a culmination from both undesireability and difficulty in accessing this region due to its mountaineous nature. So I would wager the answer being both C and D - undesireability and difficulty in access.
The Later Vedic age 1000-600 BCE
Warfare and strategy played a crucial role during the development of the First World War. During World War I new military strategies and modern tactics were conducted as a different type of warfare. Trenches warfare which was intended to protect soldiers from the enemy’s attack became a new trend to fight the war. This war tactic started to be commonly used on the Eastern Front and the Western Front during WW1. In trench warfare, the two sides dug trenches in a battlefield so as to stop the enemy from advancing. Not only did soldiers protect themselves from the enemy’s artillery but also used these trenches as shelter; the area between the opposing trench lines was fully exposed to fire from both sides.
Industrialization and mechanization reflected a new trend during those years (1914-1918) due to the development of military technology such as new weapons (grenades, poison gas, modern artillery, etc.). The development of warplanes, submarines and tanks provided armies with innovative tactics so as to control the battlefield. As a result, mass production in factories transformed standardised guns, bullets as well as uniforms. The introduction of new military technology allowed armies to act more effectively so as to achieve their military purposes.
British leaders also felt the need to tighten control over their empire. To be sure, laws regulating imperial trade and navigation had been on the books for generations, but American colonists were notorious for evading these regulations. They were even known to have traded with the French during the recently ended war. From the British point of view, it was only right that American colonists should pay their fair share of the costs for their own defense. If additional revenue could also be realized through stricter control of navigation and trade, so much the better. Thus the British began their attempts to reform the imperial system.
In 1764, Parliament enacted the Sugar Act, an attempt to raise revenue in the colonies through a tax on molasses. Although this tax had been on the books since the 1730s, smuggling and laxity of enforcement had blunted its sting. Now, however, the tax was to be enforced. An outcry arose from those affected, and colonists implemented several effective protest measures that centered around boycotting British goods. Then in 1765, Parliament enacted the Stamp Act, which placed taxes on paper, playing cards, and every legal document created in the colonies. Since this tax affected virtually everyone and extended British taxes to domestically produced and consumed goods, the reaction in the colonies was pervasive. The Stamp Act crisis was the first of many that would occur over the next decade and a half.
Can you give me a brainlist even if it the answer you looking for?.