This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L)
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
Mohammed suffered from certain qualities
Answer: The current contributions scale, valid for 2019 to 2021, was adopted by the UN General Assembly in December 2018. The four largest contributors to the United Nations – the US 22% of the UN budget), China (12.005%), Japan (8.564%) and Germany (6.0 together finance some 49% of the entire UN budget.
Explanation:
Answer:
The French Catholic missionaries
Explanation:
The French Catholic missionaries differ from the Spanish and the Portuguese in many ways starting with their behaviour towards the Native Americans. They never forced the Native to convert into Christianity. Spanish and Portuguese used violence and forced conversion as they sought to save the Native soul from hell. French Catholic missionaries were small in number dedicated to converting by travelling great distances and interacted with many different Native tribes and ethnic groups.
