<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with the economic and cultural rivalry that existed between Great Britain and Russia for dominance of the Middle East and parts of Asia, since they were trying to obtain influence and natural resources. </span></span>
Answer:
1. yes, this is justifiable because if someone is attacking you, you have to defend yourself.
2. Yes, even if the country is neutral, the people of that country should be protected against an invasion.
3. No, a lot of people die in wars and it isn't worth it just gor alliances.
4. No, war will not make your countru stronger in any way, it will just make things worse.
5. Yes, power and territory in other parts of the world will help your country gain influence if you are a good leader.
6. Yes, your country will not survive without certain resources.
7. No, a war will not prevent another war.
The answer is: They are both ran by the people but in socialism it is oversaw by the government.
( This is how their different and the characteristics they share).
