Which of the following would normally involve long-term financing?
Purchase of modern equipment;
Long-term financing is used for major purchases that are financed for a time period greater than one year such as new product development, building or purchasing new facilities, and replacing capital equipment.
Answer:
The answer is: the real gain in real GDP between 2010 and 2000 is 18.34%
Explanation:
First we have to determine the real GDP using the GDP deflator.
GDP deflator = (nominal GDP / real GDP) x 100
For year 2000:
24 = ($672 billion / real GDP ) x 100
2,400 = $672 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.28 billion
For year 2010:
51 = ($1,690 billion / real GDP ) x 100
5,100 = $1,690 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.331 billion
To calculate the real gain between real GDP from year 2000 to year 2010, we divide real GDP 2010 over real GDP 2000 and subtract 1:
($0.331 billion / $0.28 billion) -1 = 0.1834 x 100% = 18.34%
Answer:
The estimate value of the subject property is $8,269,200
The other information that would be desirable in reaching a conclusion:
The closeness of the property to central business districts as the closer it is the higher the asking price.
The estimate was solely based on revenue, the applicable costs have been ignored.
The average taken might not be a good indication for the subject property because the property might have unique features
Explanation:
The formula for Gross Rent Multiplier is given Property Price / Gross Monthly Rental Income.
In determining the estimate value of the subject property ,we calculate the gross rent multiplier of the new property,then multiply it with the annual rental income.
In ascertaining the GRM of the new property we take the average GRM of the two similar properties in the same area.This is because the new property judging from number of units, lies in-between the other two properties.
GRM for Oaks
GRM=$9000000/($550*140)
GRM =116.88
GRM for Palms
GRM=$6,600,000/($650*90)
GRM =112.82
The average GRM=(116.88+112.82)/2
=114.85
Subject property price=114.85*(120*$600)
=$8,269,200
I think the answer is E. both supply and demand would increase.
I think this because the decrease in making would lower the price of the golf clubs. Therefore making people more likely to buy (demand increasing). The supply would also increase also because with a higher demand, the people buying the golf clubs would cause their supply of golf clubs to increase.
Event recording and direct observation methods
