1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anestetic [448]
3 years ago
9

A warehouse located in an urban area had been vacant for several years. Although the warehouse was not being used, the owner of

the warehouse maintained the building in conformity with all state and local laws and regulations. One evening, thieves entered the warehouse and stripped the copper wiring from the building. In the process, the thieves damaged a stone cornice above the warehouse’s main entryway. Shortly thereafter, the cornice collapsed and injured a pedestrian. The pedestrian initiated a negligence suit against the warehouse owner, and the warehouse owner filed a motion to dismiss the case.
Which of the following findings would be sufficient to support the warehouse owner’s motion to dismiss?

A. The theft of the copper wiring was an unforeseeable intervening cause of the cornice collapse.
B. The copper wire theft and the cornice collapse were unforeseeable.
C. The pedestrian was more than half at fault for the injuries sustained.
D. The warehouse owner had maintained the building in conformity with state and local laws and regulations.
Business
1 answer:
emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer would be option A, The theft of the copper wiring was an unforeseeable intervening cause of the cornice collapse.

Explanation:

The owner of the warehouse has been taking care of the warehouse despite the fact that the warehouse was not in the use of anyone. Although the warehouse was not being used, the owner has maintained the building in conformity with all state and local laws and regulations. Now the incident happened due to the theft of the copper wire, due to which the cornice collapsed. This was totally unforeseeable and there was not even a little mistake of the owner, also he has been maintaining  the warehouse in conformity with the laws of the area, the owner can easily file a motion to dismiss the case.

You might be interested in
What is the difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage?
Yuliya22 [10]
Comparative advantage<span> refers to the ability of a party to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another.Hope you like:)</span><span>
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is human rights​
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to every person in the world, from birth until death. ... These basic rights are based on shared values like dignity, fairness, equality, respect and independence. These values are defined and protected by law.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Depending on the style of the wedding gown dash– and the size of the bride dash– a wedding dress​ custom-designed and sewn in​ j
Step2247 [10]
<span>These would be the variable costs. Since the dress uses up to a specified amount of each of these elements, the costs can vary depending on the size of the gown and the person wearing the gown. Variable costs, unlike those that are fixed, are able to change based upon outside factors.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Angell Inc. hired you as a consultant to help them estimate their cost of capital. You have been provided with the following dat
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

Option (D) is correct.

Explanation:

Given that,

Dividend, D0 =$1.20

Price, P0 = $50.00

Growth rate, g = 6% (constant)

Based on the DCF approach, then

Cost of Equity:

= [D0 × (1 + g) ÷ P0] + g

= [(1.20 × (1 + 0.06)) ÷ 50] + 0.06

= (1.272 ÷ 50) + 0.06

= 0.02544 + 0.06

= 0.08544 or 8.54%

Hence, the cost of equity from retained earnings is 8.54%.

3 0
3 years ago
In 1931, President Herbert Hoover was paid a salary of $75,000. Government statistics show a consumer price index of 15.2 for 19
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

B) $1,132,895

Explanation:

If the CPI = 15.2 in 1931, and in 2012 it was = 229.6, then President Hoover was making a fortune = (229.6 / 15.2) x $75,000 = $1,132,895, and he was a terrible president, one of the worst ones in all history.

In 2012 when President Obama was in office, he made around $400,000 and he was a much better president.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the BEST description of the Balanced​ Scorecard's customer perspective. To achieve our​ firm's vision and​ strategy: A.
    6·1 answer
  • A bussiness reports profits when ___ are greater than___.
    8·1 answer
  • a company saw a drop in sales after negative publicity around a scandal involving safetry reports. the strategic changes the com
    15·1 answer
  • The federal regulation of used-car sales requires that __________.
    15·1 answer
  • On December 31, 2020, Vitners Company had outstanding 400,000 shares of common stock and 40,000 shares of 8% cumulative preferre
    14·1 answer
  • Vivian worked as a manager at her company. She was asked to order a few cars that would be used by company employees. Which best
    12·1 answer
  • The journal entry to record the receipt of a payment within the discount period on a sale of $900 with terms of 2/10, n/30 will
    12·1 answer
  • ________ is an adjustment that is an example of a deferral. A : Cash paid or received before expenses are recognized B : Cash re
    13·1 answer
  • The initial step in channel stewardship is mapping the channels of a given industry. It calls for analyzing four major forces th
    7·1 answer
  • There will be a lower equilibrium price and higher quantity if _____.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!