Explanation:
into indirect speech.
She told you if you had enjoyed your party.
Hope it will help :
Can you be more specific?
Answer:
The indirect characterization of Reverende Parris in lines 351-366 reveals that he is nervous and hysterical.
Explanation:
"The Crucible" is a play written by Arthur Miller based on the true incidents of Salem witch trials, 1692.
The characterization of Reverend Parris in the play was also based on the true character with the same during Salem Witch trials. The author has picturized his character in the play as selfish and self-absorbed. He suffered from the feelings that someone wants to destroy him and take his position and he was also concerned so much about his reputation. That is why he builds up the story of what happened in the woods and used for his own defense.
<u>In lines 351-366, the indirect characterization of Reverend Parris reveals that he is nervous to face the crowd. The line in which he asks Putnam to leave him alone to pray for a while and Abigail's response to him, that he's been praying since midnight, reveals that he is nervous to face the crowd. He asks Putnam of what he will say to the crowd</u>.
Thus it shows that he is nervous and hysterical.
I have described myself as always having been imbued with a
fervent longing to penetrate the secrets of nature.
In this line, the author is exploring man versus nature. The
word or phrase from this passage that best demonstrated the conflict between
man and nature is perhaps ‘penetrate’ or specifically ‘penetrate the secrets of
nature’.
‘Penetrate’ means to succeed in forcing a way into or
through. This signifies that the persona in this passage wants to understand
the mysteries that surround nature.
The pieces of evidence that Murray uses to support her argument is that women should be valued for their intellect and that they should be allowed to increase their value through education.
<h3>What is central idea?</h3>
It should be noted that the central idea or argument simply means the main information that's conveyed in a literary work.
Here, the pieces of evidence that Murray uses to support her argument is that women should be valued for their intellect and that they should be allowed to increase their value through education.
Learn more about central ideas on:
brainly.com/question/1914190
#SPJ1
