1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KiRa [710]
3 years ago
14

Below is the production possibilities frontier for the United States. It shows that the United States is able to produce either

100 barrels of oil or 25 bushels of corn using all of its available resources. Also suppose that the United States decides to produce at point A : 60 barrels of oil and 10 bushels of corn. If the United States engages in international trade and trades 20 barrels of oil for 20 bushels of corn with another country, it will be able to consume outside of its production possibilities frontier. How many bushels of corn will it have at the end of the exchange
Business
1 answer:
hammer [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

30 bushels of corn

Explanation:

opportunity cost of producing 1 barrel of oil = 25/100 = 0.25 bushels of corn

opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of corn = 100/25 = 4 barrels of oil

current production:

60 barrels of oil

10 bushels of corn

if it trades 20 barrels of oil in exchange for 20 bushels of corn, it will be gaining 20 - (20 x 0.25) = 15 bushels of corn

after the exchange, the US will have 30 bushels of corn and 40 barrels of oil

this level is outside the PPF curve because if the US produced 40 barrels of oil, its maximum production of corn would have been 15 bushels (remember the 15 bushels of corn gained).

You might be interested in
Kelly Addison is a designer clothing buyer for a chain of department stores. She has gone through several negotiation certificat
Yanka [14]

Full question:

Kelly Addison is a designer clothing buyer for a chain of department stores. She has gone through several negotiation certification programs and is considered an expert negotiator by her peers.

-When Kelly sees value in a product but does not want to pay the offered price, she often offers to split the difference between what she wants to pay and what the seller wants. Which of the following would be most likely to stall the negotiations with Kelly?

A)accepting the offer to split the difference

B)making another pricing counteroffer

C)offering better delivery and payment terms if she matches the asked price

D)standing firm on price but offering a discount for the second order

Answer:

<u>B) making another pricing counteroffer</u>

<u>Explanation:</u>

We are told that Kelly Addison is an expert negotiator and has received several negotiation certification programs. She also has a policy in which whenever she sees value in a product but does not want to pay the offered price, she splits the difference between what she wants to pay and what the seller wants.

Thus, making another pricing counteroffer <u>may stall the negotiations with Kelly.</u>

6 0
4 years ago
Quigley Inc. is considering two financial plans for the coming year. Management expects sales to be $300,000, operating costs to
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

b. 2.59%

Explanation:

<u>The assets are 200,000</u>

<u>For Plan A</u>

it will be 25% debt  = 200,000 x 25% = 50,000

and 75% equity      = 200,000 x 75% = 150,000

The debt will generate 8.8% interest expense

50,000 x 8.8% = 4,400

Income for the expected project under Plan A

sales revenue 300,000

operating cost 265,000

EBIT                     35,000

interest expense  4,400

EBT                      30,600

income tax            10,710

Net income          19,890

TE = times interest earned = EBIT /interest expense

35,000 / 4,400 = 7,95 It achieve the requirement of 4.5 or above

ROE for plan A  net income / equity

19,890/150,000 = 0,1326 = 13.26%

<u>Under Plan B</u>

We will take as much debt as we can until TIE = 4.5

so:

EBIT / interest expense = TIE

35,000/interest expense = 4.5

35,000/4.5 = 7.777,78

This will be the interest expense for plan B

Now we calculate net income:

(EBIT - interest) x (1- tax-rate) = net income

(35,000 - 7,777.78) x (1-35%) = 17.694,443

and for the ROE for plan B first, we need to check the capital structure:

The interest expense are the 8.8% of the debt so

debt x rate = interest expense

interest expense / rate = debt

7,777.78/0.088 = 88.383,86

Asset = debt + equty

200,000 = 88,383.86 + equity

200,000 - 88,383.86 = equity = 111,616.14‬

Now, we got the capital structure

debt 88,383.86

equity 111,616.14

ROE for Plan B

17,694.443 / 111,616.14 = 0,15852943 = 15.85%

now we compare both ROE

Plan A 13.26%

Plan B 15.85%

Difference 2.59%

Using Plan B will increase the ROE for 2.59%

6 0
3 years ago
In July, one of the processing departments at Junkin Corporation had beginning work in process inventory of $29,000 and ending w
Anarel [89]

Answer and Explanation:

The construction of the cost reconciliation report for the department for the month of July is shown below:

Cost to be Accounted For :    

Beginning Work in process inventory $29,000

Add: Cost added to production      $205,000

Total Cost to Be accounted For $ 234,000  

Cost Accounted for as Follows    

Cost of Ending Work in process inventory $31,000  

Add: Cost of units Transferred Out $203,000

Total Cost Accounted For $234,000

The total cost accounted for could be computed by two methods

1. Adding the cost added to the beginning work in process inventory

2. Adding the cost of units transferred out to the ending work in process inventory

4 0
3 years ago
The Babylonians in Sumer used what as a monetary commodity
Minchanka [31]
They used the shekel
8 0
4 years ago
The idea that investors today compare the returns on bonds with differing times to maturity to see which is expected to give the
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

expectations theory

Explanation:

Expectations theory is defined as the prediction of what short-term interest rates will amount to in future based on the current long-term interest rates on an investment.

The theory suggests or states that "an investor will earn the same amount of interest by investing in two consecutive one-year bond investments that in one two-year bond investment".

Simply put, the theory say that one can invest twice in a one year bond and still make the same interest rate as investing once in a two-year bond.

This theory helps investors to make profits faster and even higher through multiple investments on bonds.

Cheers.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A __________ strategy can be best defined as a plan, used by international companies, that involves customizing products, promot
    13·1 answer
  • Jessica paid $350,000 for her house in 2010 and sold it six years later for $400,000.
    9·1 answer
  • Bernson Corporation is using a predetermined overhead rate that was based on estimated total fixed manufacturing overhead of $49
    9·1 answer
  • Kyrgyzstan is a small mountainous country with a predominantly agricultural economy. Cotton, wool, and meat are the main agricul
    10·1 answer
  • Many years ago, a father opened a UGMA account for his young son. The son has just turned 17 and the father believes that the so
    11·1 answer
  • Your uncle just won the weekly lottery, receiving $375,000, which he invested at a 7.5% annual rate. He now has decided to retir
    9·1 answer
  • When accounting for revenue over time for a long-term contract, the percentage of completion used to recognize revenue in the fi
    9·1 answer
  • What is the manager​
    11·2 answers
  • Why is it important for the government to achieve these five objectives?
    5·1 answer
  • The field of accounting that focuses on providing information for external decision makers is.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!