1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovikov84 [41]
3 years ago
13

how did industrialization and expansion bring about the competing forces of nationalism and sectionalism

History
1 answer:
IrinaVladis [17]3 years ago
6 0
To industrialize so that they could catch up with western powers or stay strong, they had to constantly use natural resources. Once they realized that their own natural resources were not enough, they had to expand imperialistically; that is, acquiring overseas/overland colonies, such as the British in India producing cotton and textiles and the Spanish in Latin America.

As time went on and the abuses of these mother nations went on, those who were ruled over decided to band together as a common ethnic group with the same goal of getting rid of their rulers and unifying their split up groups. This resulted in the unification of people, an independent nation, as well as the removal of foreign powers within that nation.

Examples include the various revolutions throughout the west: the American, French, Haitian, and Latin American revolutions, as well as the revolutions throughout Africa: the revolutions in Algeria, Angola, and Ghana.

However, not all people within a nation were entirely for this idea, resulting in the competing forces of nationalism and sectionalism. For example, during the process of unification in Italy, there were areas of modern Italy that were very different from the other parts of Italy, becoming an obstacle for unification. Specifically, Piedmont, which is Northern Italy today, was industrialized and had a centralized system of governance, while areas in Southern Italy, such as Sicily, were poor and still had an agrarian society.
You might be interested in
The system of checks and balances establishes that the Judicial Branch has the power to
inessss [21]
I would stay that the system of checks and balances for the judicial branch is to declare laws unconstitutional.
5 0
3 years ago
In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), the Supreme Court ruled the ___________ gerrymanders were not constitutional.
Leona [35]

The racial gerrymanders is the answer.  The Supreme Court ruled that the new boundaries were aimed at excluding African Americans from voting.  It violated the Fourteenth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause by moving an entire population of Blacks out of the district.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The 16​ amendment provided for which of the following
Gnom [1K]
D. Universal suffrage for women
7 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST 49+25 POINTS!!!
tigry1 [53]

trade came to a halt

workers were in great shortage

and possibly demanding higher wages. Depends on the overall economy of the certain area of the pandemic

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can some one describe the oath of allegiance? but in their own words
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

hi

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is a coalition?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the message of the feminine mystique
    8·1 answer
  • The doctrine of the affections was a popular theory in the ________________ era.
    12·2 answers
  • Accumulate ina sentence
    13·2 answers
  • Which phrases describe reforms President Wilson promoted?
    6·2 answers
  • The years between the First and Second World wars saw [Q1] aviators setting records. The record-setting aviators became internat
    7·1 answer
  • What is direct popular election?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the strategic advantage to
    15·1 answer
  • There is tension between many EU countries because there is more wealth in _______ Europe.
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone help me answer these please!
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!