I would choose number 2 and deport my brother. I don’t even have a brother though so I beat the system
Igor Stravinsky rite of spring
I think it's B because a they have to review the original record since it is their job to decide whether the lower court decision was constitutional. And to do their job they also have to consider the arguements for each side. On a appeal no new facts are presented (fun fact). Frankly it's just my opinion, but B seems the most logical.
It would be an area of bright white light