During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Spaniards tried to explain the exercise of Aztec painting via the lens of the EU art concept. Their rhetoric and iconography, which constructed a distorted view of painting in Aztec Mexico, potentially tell us less about that practice than it does about the anxieties and expectancies of individuals who produced those texts and photographs. As students have recommended, the art of portrayal might also have furnished a domain for touch and compatibility among Aztecs and Spaniards.
Whilst Aztec emperor, Montezuma had a well-known disagreement with Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés. He initially welcomed Cortés but, while unable to shop for him off, laid a entice in Tenochtitlán. Cortés, but, took Montezuma prisoner, hoping to prevent an Aztec attack.
When Moctezuma went to fulfill them at Huitzillan, he bestowed gifts on Cortes he gave him flora, put necklaces on him hung garlands around him, and put wreaths on his head. Then he laid out before him, the golden necklaces, all of his items for the Spaniards.
Learn more about Moctezuma and Cortes here:-brainly.com/question/6711918
#SPJ9
So a social contract is where a "persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live".
Rousseau was most famous for coming up with the term but examples have always existed and exist right now.
An example of how a social contract works would be the legal system. For augments sake, if I say you stole all my money and you deny it, instead of fighting it out with fists or me raiding your house to find it with a gun, we both put our faith in the legal system which we both agree will be more impartial, and get to the truth. I surrender my right to take matters into my own hands on the condition that you will also do the same. Why did we do this? Because there are more benefits than not having this system in place. I may not be able to get personal revenge on you for stealing my money but I also am protected from people doing the same to me. People who are born in a state metaphorically "sign" the contract when they are born in order to live in the state.
A primitive example if you want would be that two people meet in the woods looking for berries. Both have guns and are distrustful of the other. They are constantly looking over their shoulders at each other out of fear which prevents them from going about their berry gathering. Eventually they both agree to a "contract" that they will both give up their guns at the same time. They do this because whilst you do not want to give up your gun, it means that you don't have to worry about getting shot in the back so times are more productive.
The theory is the same even if people disagree on why social contracts exist. Folk like Rousseau thought that social contracts arose because at the end of the day, humans are more interested in personal liberty and life and wish to avoid conflict as much as possible. More pessimistic people like Hobbes thought it was because humans are so naturally warlike that we needed social contracts to prevent our own violent natures.
Skjdmememssnndnsndnsdndnnd
Answer: Native Americans who were forced out of Illinois because their homeland was given up in a treaty. Their plan of going back failed; forces of Illinois slaughtered most of them as they tried to flee.
Explanation:
