Answer:
Explanation:
By Tom Jawetz July 22, 2019, 4:45 am
Restoring the Rule of Law Through a Fair, Humane, and Workable Immigration System
Getty/Mario Tama
New U.S. citizens gather at a naturalization ceremony, March 2018.
OVERVIEW
Policymakers must break free of the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws, and advance an immigration system that is fair, humane, and actually works.
PRESS CONTACT
For more information and updates on this topic, see CAP’s series: “Reframing the Immigration Debate.”
Introduction and summary
The immigration debate in America today is nearly as broken as the country’s immigration system itself. For too many years, the conversation has been predicated on a false dichotomy that says America can either honor its history and traditions as a nation of immigrants1 or live up to its ideals as a nation of laws by enforcing the current immigration system.2 Presented with this choice,3 supporters of immigration—people who recognize the value that immigrants bring to American society, its culture, and its economy, as well as the important role that immigrants play in the nation’s continued prosperity—have traditionally seized the mantle of defending America as a nation of immigrants.4 By doing this, however, rather than challenging the dichotomy itself, supporters have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.5 The fundamental problem with this debate is that America is, and has always been, both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Debates over a liberal immigration policy actually predate the start of the nation itself; they infused the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, America’s founding document.6
GET THE LATEST ON IMMIGRATION
Email
Social Contract.
the key work is consent
Answer:
Freedom Riders were civil rights activists who in 1961 staged protest trips to the southern United States, declaring racial segregation on public buses unconstitutional.
In 1961, the intercity bus symbolized more than anything else the anti-racist struggle in the United States. Racial segregation on buses and their stops was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, but remained in force in the southern states, as were many other forms of racism.
Thus, on May 4, 1961, a group of white and black Freedom Riders, as they would go down in history, embarked on a protest bus ride from Washington. The final destination was New Orleans. However, the trip ended in Alabama, where, in the absence of police, white Birmingham residents, who later turned out to be members and supporters of the Ku Klux Klan, banned buses and beat protesters furiously. who were eventually forced to return to Washington by air. However, other protesters took their place, as on May 20, eighteen students traveled from Birmingham to the capital of Alabama, Montgomery. At the end of the march, protesters were waiting for hundreds of racists. All the protesters, as well as members of the press, were beaten, but the whites who took part in the "freedom ride" were beaten with particular fury. The incidents escalated to such an extent that the state came under martial law and Justice Secretary Robert Kennedy, an ardent supporter of the protesters, sent hundreds of Alabama National Guard men to restore order, albeit temporarily.
I think the answer is c. the duke of Normandy who invaded and took control of England in 1066. not sure... but good luck on this
