Answer:
dont drink out of plastic water bottles drink out of glass instead, dont use straws, dont use plastic utensils use metal instead, make sure to cut up the plastic that comes around soda cans when you buy them so when that eventually goes in the ocean the fish dont get stuck,
and thats all i can think of
Explanation:
a. m. rose (ed.) human behaviour and social processes (pp.128-147). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul is related with "The Meaning of Contemplation for Social Qualitative Research".
<h3>What was written in that book?</h3>
In this work, contemplative reflection in qualitative social research is described. It considers the ways in which the researcher's fundamental assumptions can be analyzed and bracketed in order to shed light on the process by which knowledge is produced, with an emphasis on the researcher's experiences, including sensory and emotional experiences, and the work of the mind in the investigative process. The author discusses the crucial role of subjectivity in qualitative research and offers inspiration for more attentive research through an examination of the techniques of meditation, auto-observation and self-reports, epoché, "contemplative memoing," and the contemplative diary. Thus, it will be interesting to sociology, anthropology, and geography academics who are interested in phenomenology, research techniques, and the function of the mind in the research process.
To know more about human behaviour and social processes visit: brainly.com/question/10264939
#SPJ4
He is using the "Labeling" aspect of the categorization part of the perception process.
Labelling is portraying somebody or something in a word or short phrase.[1] For instance, depicting somebody who has infringed upon a law as a criminal. Labelling hypothesis is a hypothesis in human science which credits marking of individuals to control and distinguishing proof of degenerate conduct. It has been contended that labelling is fundamental for communication. However, the utilization of the term is frequently proposed to feature the way that the name is a depiction connected all things considered, as opposed to something characteristic for the named thing.
when you turn 9 upside down it becomes 6
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
