<em>The Lord of the Flies</em> was published in 1954, a few years after the end of World War II, and it was highly influenced by Golding's first-hand experience of the conflict - he had fought in it as a naval officer. In spite of the novel's pessimistic, yet sadly realistic, tone, its aim, I believe, is to stress the defects of humanity with the ultimate goal of encouraging it to improve and be kinder and more considerate. Hence the cultural relevance of this idea in the 1950s, when the world was still recovering from the largest and most terrible war in history, and it was necessary to remind its inhabitants of the importance of showing benevolence, compassion, disposition, and generosity, in other words, humanity, and of the dramatic consequences of not doing so, even through such bitter and harsh reminders as Golding's novel.
The type of evidence which <em>Machiavelli uses</em> to support his claim that a prince should have no aim <em>other than war and its rules </em>and discipline is:
- D. Both logical and anecdotal evidence.
According to the given question, we are asked to state the type of evidence which <em>Machiavelli uses</em> to support his claim that a prince should have no aim <em>other than war and its rules </em>and discipline.
As a result of this, we can see that from the complete text, Machiavelli believes that the Prince should have no other aim o<em>ther than learning the art of war </em>and its rules and disciplines and he made his arguments using logical and anecdotal evidences.
Read more about anecdotal evidence here:
brainly.com/question/3208512
Okay, I read it, now, What is you question? I need more to run with :)
It's Emma Ross' television is almost as big as my entire bedroom
Answer:
i dont know im also having trouble doing this question
Explanation:
its because when you