Schenck v. United States was a Supreme Court case about the enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917. I believe the case went straight to the Supreme Court and resulted in the Court's ruling that the criminal conviction of Schenck was in fact constitutional.
Answer:
C. Increase in price due to shortage of goods
Explanation:
If an item sells more than usual then prices will raise to force more customers to buy it.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" which a legal standard of guilt in Texas was used in criminal cases. It is the standard that should be met by the evidence of the prosecution in a criminal case. This means that there should be no other logical explanation that can be derived from facts not including the fact the suspect or defendant committed such crime.
A C D I think might be wrong tho
It should be C. You may want to check though, I’m not a expert
