Answer:
adversary system
Explanation:
The adversary system is a legal system mostly found in common law countries where two distinct advocates represent their political group’s case or stands before a jury or judge in order to ascertain the truth and ensure judgement is passed accordingly. Criminal trial courts operate in this system and the accused person is not usually being asked to give any form of evidence in adversarial proceedings.
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
I think it is C
Explanation:
because it is what i think
Hamilton believed that the National Bank was permitted in terms of the 10th amendment. He interpreted it as if the National Bank was constitutional.
