Answer:
It went against it because you can't take property without fair compensation which is stated in the fifth amendment.
Explanation:
In the fifth amendment it states that the government can not take private property without fair compensation.
Answer:
The case can move up to an appeal or superior court.
Explanation:
If a legal error made by the previous judge or peace is successfully argued to the appeal/superior court, then the case will be reheard. This process can continue up to the supreme court (the highest court of the land in most jurisdictions), where a final judgement will be made. No "moving up" can occur after the case is judged by the supreme court.
Answer: Microsociology
Explanation:
The level of analysis that Sheila is most likely to use in this study is the microsociology. Unlike the macrosociology, the microsociology uses the interaction which involves face to face and it involves a small group in order to have their perception on certain topics. If the whole transportation system was involved which includes air, water and land, the macrosociology will be applicable.
This technique is known as Foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a way of having a person to furnish or follow a big request with the aid of using to begin with making small or modest requests.
The approach is primarily based totally at the good judgment that if a respondent (the individual being requested) can furnish an preliminary small or modest request, then the respondent might be maximum probable to later furnish a bigger request that he/she (the respondent) might now no longer have granted if requested outright (with out being approached with small requests first).
To learn more about foot-in-the-door phenomenon, click here:
brainly.com/question/15745551
#SPJ4
