1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fiesta28 [93]
3 years ago
9

HELP QUICK!(ps.I DONT WANT FACTS I WANT A PARAGRAPH!!!)

History
2 answers:
Mandarinka [93]3 years ago
6 0
There can be different explanations for the same event in history because there are two sides to every story. For an example the revolutionary war can be told from George Washington’s point of view as well as from King George |||. George Washington could say that The Boston Tea Party was a simple retaliation from the Patriots to the British for being unfair by only allowing tea to be bought from British companies, but King George ||| can say that The Boston Tea Party was an act of pure disrespect for the British.
Natalija [7]3 years ago
3 0

Two people might witness the event but not necessarily have the same point of view. Some people might be experts in a certain area, like warfare or being a ship's captain, and therefore might be more qualified to say what actually happened than someone without that expertise. Both people could be telling the truth as they saw and heard it, but the actual events might be different. In addition, some people might be biased, and their personal opinions of an event could influence their account.

You might be interested in
A(n) ___________ increases the amount of money in the money supply.
xz_007 [3.2K]
Reserve requirement is the answer to this
8 0
4 years ago
Which of the following was not an element of Alexander Hamilton's financial plan for the United States?
loris [4]

(c) Creating State Banks

6 0
3 years ago
Who are high officials in the Roman Catholic Church
ValentinkaMS [17]
 bishops<span>, </span>priests<span>, and </span><span>deacons</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which allied nation controlled the suez canal in north africa
SSSSS [86.1K]
United Kingdom/Great Britain
4 0
3 years ago
How did the relationship between the U.S. and the Soviet Union change after WWII?
Pepsi [2]
U.S.-Soviet<span> Alliance, 1941–1945. Although </span>relations between<span> the </span>Soviet Union<span>and the </span>United States<span> had been strained in the years before </span>World War II<span>, the </span>U.S.-Soviet<span> alliance of 1941–1945 </span>was<span> marked by a great degree of cooperation and </span>was<span> essential to securing the defeat of Nazi Germany.

i know this cause i took it 2 years ago so yea hope this helped
=)

</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Need help with this question
    13·1 answer
  • Which delegate of pennsylvania refused to sign the declaration of independence
    9·1 answer
  • What movement arose in the late 19th century in opposition to the academies?
    11·1 answer
  • The European union is an economic alliance that was formed to
    15·1 answer
  • Explain how Christianity spread throughout Europe
    8·2 answers
  • What was Edward I's most significant accomplishment?
    12·2 answers
  • a skydiver jumps out of an air plane. after 0.8 seconds, she has fallen 100 feet. after 3.1 seconds, she has fallen 500 feet. em
    15·1 answer
  • What were the reasons the bomb should have been used on Japan? explain in 1 complete paragraph please thanks.
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement describes Ayatollah Khomeini?
    7·1 answer
  • According to Taft, should race be used to determine voting eligibility?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!