Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Simple answer....too break it down if there was no consumers there would be Stores open.
Definition of consumer is a person who purchases goods and services for personal use.
The given statement, "The board of directors oversees and ratifies strategic decisions and evaluates, rewards, and, if necessary, penalizes top managers" is true
<u>Explanation:
</u>
A board of directors is a team of experts elected by stockholders of a company to serve the interest of the stockholders and ensure that the company management behaves on their behalf. The Chairperson or Chairman of the Board is the head of the Board of Directors.
The board of directors supervises and ratifies strategic decisions as intermediaries between the owners and managers and reviews, awards and, if required, punishes top management.
These includes the following,
- Composition
- Leadership structure
- Interlocks
The Board decides on the employment and recruitment of employees, share price measures, payments, and employee compensation.
