<h3><u><em>I</em></u><u><em>
nitial considerations</em></u></h3>
- <em>radius = 1.8 in</em>
- <em>tall = 6.7 in</em>
- <em>Volume?</em>
<h3><u><em>Resolution</em></u></h3>
<em>Volume = base area x tall</em>
<em>base area = π x (1.8in)²</em>
<em>base area = 10.179 in²</em>
<em>Volume = 10.179 in² x 6.7 in</em>
<em>Volume = 68.198 in³</em>
<h3 /><h3><em><u>Answer</u></em></h3>
<em>the volume is 68.198 in³</em>
Answer:
Yes, these triangles are congruent
∠E≅∠M
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, these triangles are similar.
<em>Proof:</em>
Each side in LNM is
times longer than the sides in GFE



According CPCTC (corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent), angle E is similar to angle M.
Hope this helps :)
Have a good day!
Answer:
5 is half of ten hope it helps
Answer:
- multiplying a multi-digit number by itself several times (finding the power of a number)
- finding a square root
- statistical calculations
Step-by-step explanation:
We don't know what your introduction tells you, but the above-listed operations are ones I choose to use a calculator for. I also use a calculator for ordinary arithmetic, such as division by numbers with 2 digits or more. (It is simply faster and requires no scratch paper.)
If statistical calculations are not done with a calculator, they at least require the availability of suitable tables.
___
All of these operations can be done by hand without a calculator, and were in times passed. Lifetimes of effort were involved in generating some of the original math tables for statistics, trig, logarithms, and other functions readily evaluated using a modern calculator.
Answer:
x ≈ {-11.789, +0.501, 11.288}
Step-by-step explanation:
The cubic g(x) - f(x) = 0 has three real solutions. It can be rewritten as ...

Since the solutions are irrational, they are best found using a spreadsheet or graphing calculator. My favorite graphing calculator shows the approximate solutions below.
_____
<em>Comment on the problem statement</em>
Your expression for f(x) is ambiguous in that many Brainly questions have the exponentiation indicator replaced by a blank: 3 x -1 often means 3^x -1 and sometimes means 3^(x-1). We have taken the expression at face value and have assumed it is a linear expression. If otherwise, the problem is basically worked the same way: write a function h(x) = g(x) - f(x) and look for solutions to h(x) = 0. Graphing can be useful.