Answer:
Bill shouldnt trade movie tickets for basketball tickets, since MRS > Pb/Pm.
Explanation:
Price ratio = Pb/Pm
= $46/$10
= 4.6
MRS = 5/1
= 5
MRS > Pb/Pm
Therefore, Bill shouldnt trade movie tickets for basketball tickets, since MRS > Pb/Pm.
Answer:
Differentiation.
Explanation:
The concept of value for the customer corresponds to the expectation that the product will meet the needs, desires and features that he expects.
The customer's perception of the concept of value is affected in rational and irrational ways, such as brand image, product performance, high price, etc.
Therefore, when a company offers a product at a higher price, it is passing on to the consumer the higher production cost of an item, which has features that add greater value and functionality, such as differentiation, personalization or an unforgettable customer experience.
Differentiated products are those produced in a more heterogeneous way compared to standard products, therefore differentiated products have distinct characteristics that add greater value, such as new features, technology, design, durability, style, etc.
Visible artifacts; and underlying values. If you don't find an answer on this site, use Google.
Answer:
resource acquisition
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the argument for diversity best demonstrated by intel's actions would be resource acquisition. This is when a company focuses on obtaining the right resources needed to accomplish the goals and needs of a project. Which in this case are talented individuals who happen to be minority workers.
Given:
<span>Fact 1: During contract negotiations, BB’s sales representative promised that the system was “A-1” and “perfect.”
</span><span>Fact 2: The written contract, which the parties later signed, disclaimed all warranties, express and implied.
</span><span>Fact 3: After installation the computer produced only random numbers and letters, rather than the desired accounting information
The express warranty is given in Fact 1 where the Sales Rep promised that the system was "A-1" and "perfect". There is a breach in express warranty here IF the written contract also expresses the same promises.
However, the written contract </span>disclaimed all warranties, express and implied. AND BOTH PARTIES SIGNED THIS CONTRACT. It implies that the buyer has read through the contract and has agreed with what is written in the contract. Thus, they can't file a suit against BB for breaching an express warranty since the written and signed contract has already disclaimed all warranties.