The government can control tariffs and can limit how much can be imported into the usa.
The government can provide subsidies to certain producers, typically farmers.
The government can put a ceiling and a floor on prices as they wish. They can control the lowest and highest price a commodity can sell for.
The government can own public works such as a water company if they feel they can provide the service for a lower cost than the local competitors.
The government can decide which companies are monopolies and which companies are violating federal policies regarding trade. The government has the power to break up monopolies.
Each of these has advantages and disadvantages. For example, for farmers, when prices on their crops are too low, the government "gives" them money for their crops so they can stay in business.
A monopoly business controls the price and supply. If the monopoly is broken up, then competitors can enter the field- this can help drive down prices.
If the government can provide utility services for cheaper, that is good.
Answer: B. spillover
Explanation:
A Spillover is used to refer to the effects of an Externality which is what happens when a market exchange leads to effects on a third party that was not party to a transaction between the contracting parties.
The activities that result from the transaction spillover to the third party and can be either negative or positive. A negative spillover would be countries in Africa getting harsher global warming effects due to companies in china polluting the atmosphere.
Answer:
b. 3,249 units
Explanation:
Step 1. Given information.
Fix costs are 32.000
Depreciation expense 9.700
Contribution margin 9.85
Step 2. Formulas needed to solve the exercise.
Break even point = Fixed cost / contribution per unit
Step 3. Calculation.
Break even point= $32.000/$9.85= 3,248.73 rounded to 3,249
Step 4. Solution.
3.249 units is the minimum number of units to ensure its potential loss does not exceed the desired level
Option B is correct i.e. 3.249 units
In this scenario, Yater's Inc. has decided to use (B) one-brand-name strategy.
<h3>
What is a co-branding strategy?</h3>
- Co-branding is a marketing tactic in which various brand identities are applied to a product or service as a result of a strategic partnership.
- Co-branding (or "cobranding"), often known as a brand partnership, refers to a variety of branding alliances that typically involve the brands of at least two businesses.
<h3>What is a one-brand-name strategy?</h3>
- When employing a single-brand approach, a business targets only one particular market segment with each of its brands.
- Each brand has its own distinct "personality," is handled separately, and is distinctly differentiated from the rest of the company's brands.
<h3>
What is a transactional marketing strategy?</h3>
- A business technique known as "point of sale" transactions is called transactional marketing.
- Instead of focusing on forging a relationship with the customer, individual sales are being optimized for efficiency and volume.
Therefore, in this scenario, Yater's Inc. has decided to use (B) one-brand-name strategy.
Know more about brands here:
brainly.com/question/24456504
#SPJ4
