1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mumz [18]
4 years ago
13

How did Philip II and Alexander change Greece?

History
1 answer:
lbvjy [14]4 years ago
6 0
When Philip II was King of Macedonia, his main goal was Greece. He admired their culture and the land itself, and after the Peloponnesian Wars, he set out on a huge war of conquest.
Back in Athens, they knew Philip was coming. Leaders were called together, but few responded. Therefore, they were overtook by Philip's massive army and were now subject to his rule.
While at his daughter's wedding, Philip was assassinated, and his son Alexander was left the throne. Like any other empire, word spread around fast, and soon there was a rebellion in Thebes. As it turned out, not many knew Alexander was at the throne, and when he figured out about this revolt, he sent out his army with no hesitation.
When he arrived, he fought the Theban people and enslaved the citizens, letting it be an example of what would happen to anybody that questioned his rule.
Soon, Alexander led his army throughout Asia and Europe and conquered many civilizations and former rivals, such as Persia. He wished to conquer Persia not only because it was a Greek enemy, but because of the riches it held.
Soon, Alexander began to build cities named after himself, and established a new culture- called the Hellenistic culture. It was a mixture of Greek, Persian, Syrian, and many other cultures combined. It was widely accepted throughout his empire, as Alexander was considered a descendant of the Gods and was to be obeyed. This tells us how Alexander used religion to enforce the rules and expectations of how his subjects were to behave.
One day, Alexander got malaria. His generals wanted to know who would inherit the throne, and he responded "the strongest". However, nobody could come to a consensus on who was the strongest, and therefore his empire was divided into three parts, all of which were conquered.
In conclusion, Philip and Alexander changed the empire in many ways, with Alexander fulfilling the dreams of his father and finishing what he started, all in hopes of creating a great empire with inspiration from the Greeks. He worked to spread Greek culture despite its decline, and fueled an age of information where some of the best scholars and teachers known to this day were born.

You might be interested in
I owned and mechanized steel. when workers began to strike, I hired replacement workers who would accept lower wages. I won the
Ganezh [65]
I think the answer is Andrew Carnegie.  He did not allow an increase in salary despite the more than a half increase in sales and profit that the Homestead received. 

The workers did not accept the decision and made a lockout strike. Carnegie won the case but left a bloody marked in history. The strike ended for more than a hundred days.








7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did you decide for or against getting the plow explain your response​
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

i decided because

Explanation:

i decided

7 0
3 years ago
List three ways in which the new state governments remained quite similar to the way they were governed as colonies.
torisob [31]
Neeeed points my bad bro
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did sitting bull choose not to negotiate with the us government
balu736 [363]
U.S. Indian Agent James McLaughlin feared Sitting Bull <span>and ordered his arrest on December 15, 1890. Sitting Bull refused to cooperate and a scuffle ensued. A nearby Lakota, Catch-the-Bear, shot the arresting officer, who fired back, killing Sitting Bull.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What were at least three key ways that the South differed from the North in the past?
mixer [17]

Answer:                    

The three key ways the South differed from the North in the past given below.

Explanation:

The Southern economy based on farming. The soil was fertile and good for growing crops like cotton, tobacco, and rice. Many big farms and plantations relied on slaves who became the main source of labours. In the North, despite having no fertile soil as the South, they established many large cities with manufacturing industries. The North encourages free labour and considered slavery as an evil practice, while the South promoted it and recognised it to be legal. The white Southerners were literate than their Northern counterparts.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the 1920s more than a million blacks moved from the South to cities in the North. Which was not a result of that migratio
    7·1 answer
  • It can be difficult for fiscal policy to influence the economy in the way the government hopes it will. All of the following are
    10·1 answer
  • All of the following are adaptations made by Texans to their environment EXCEPT — dams and bridges irrigation ditches terraced f
    12·1 answer
  • Which ruler broke with the Egyptian practice of worshiping many gods and declared that Egyptians should worship only Aten, the s
    8·2 answers
  • Match the characteristics to the independent nations of Southeast Asia. Myanmar Sri Lanka Philippines experienced bloody conflic
    11·2 answers
  • Why didn't the federal local governments collect an excise tax on alcohol during prohibition
    14·1 answer
  • Ancient Athens was ruled by what form of government?
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you think the third step of pure communism that marx predicted has never taken place
    13·1 answer
  • I need help I don't know the answer
    7·1 answer
  • To what degree does (the filibuster, campaign finance, or gerrymandering) affect Congress’ ability to legislate effectively?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!