<span>The
Ottomans and Safavids have fought each other mainly because the
Ottomans were Sunni Muslim and the Safavids were Shiite Muslim. They
also fought each other because expanding borders is part of what
sustains the economy of these two empires. As a result of conflict
between these two empires, each empire's economy was depleted because it
spent so much on wars that ended up not helping the empire in any way.
This partially contributed to the decline of these two empires. </span>
Answer:
Argument Detailing Roosevelt was not justified:
Roosevelt Put thousands of Japanese citizens of the US into Internment camps, initially ending Japanese freedom in the US. Now, I could see this as an act to prevent Japanese sabotage in the United states however, This act ended Japanese Business, Japanese dreams of success. This was effectively one of roosevelts worst descisions. Roosevelt justified the order on the area of military necessity, declaring that Japanese Americans were a threat to national security. This was not justified at all! How could every Japanese citizen collude with its government? I think that Roosevelt was blindsided by the suprise attack just like every american and treated the japanese nationality with hostility and disrespect!
Argument Detailing Roosevelt was Justified: He was very justified. We were talking peace with the Japanese before the pearl harbor attacks,trying to find a solution to our deteriorating relations, Thousands of american Sailors and marines died that day and the Japanese could attack from inside the US using Sabotage and spies, Many Japanese agreed with Imperialistic Japanese views! They believed Japan should be a Great empire with vast territory and a large army. The only way to stop an entire attack from inside the US was to put Japanese citizens in these internment camps!
Answer: 1) scientific revolution that preceded industrial revolution and which took place in the European Nortwest (science free of religious dogmatism), 2) progressive rational/empiric philosophy of Enlightenment (economic and consequently also political liberalism), 3) free access to raw materials in colonies (Africa, Americas and Asia).
Explanation: Scientic revolution introduced (not completely but almost completely) a mechanistic and materialistic metaphor of the world....so in the 19th century this perspective became predominant (soon after it was an organicist/Darwinian perspective), Enlightenment questioned divine rights of royal power (medieval and ancient idea) and introduced rights of man and consequently idea of society free of all economic and political limitations and then there were vast lands oveseas that could supply necessary material. What makes part of all that is French revolution, first machines and slavery (which abolished during the 19th century).
Answer:
Colonists object to violations of their natural rights.
Explanation:
The statement refers to the Olive Branch Petition of July 5, 1775. It was a letter to King George III, which emphasized that the signatories' intention was to stop the Revolutionary War if the requirements were met by the British Parliament. There was continued loyalty to the king, who was proposed a ceasefire until the colonial problems with Great Britain were resolved. Finally, this petition was not considered by King George III, therefore causing the Declaration of Independence almost a year later.
