1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
strojnjashka [21]
3 years ago
5

Taxation without representation is tyranny. Why did James Otis make this statement? He believed that America's representatives i

n Parliament were corrupt. He was a Loyalist who supported British taxes after the war with France. He believed American colonists should be able to vote in Parliament. He was the head of the Massachusetts Committee of Correspondence.
History
2 answers:
mihalych1998 [28]3 years ago
8 0
"<span>He believed American colonists should be able to vote in Parliament" "Representation" in this context means having elected representatives in Parliament to make decisions on your behalf. </span>
ddd [48]3 years ago
7 0

The right option is:

He believed American colonists should be able to vote in Parliament" "Representation" in this context means having elected representatives in Parliament to make decisions on your behalf.

Explanation:

No taxation without representation" is a slogan beginning during the 1700s that compiled a primary grievance of the American colonists in the Thirteen Provinces, which was one of the principal foundations of the Western Revolution. James Otis was one of the most exciting and powerful champions of American conservatives during the 1760s, but his bright star dimmed during his lifetime and continues so today. He was born in West Barnstable on Cape Cod.

You might be interested in
Where do global companies now look for the natural resources they need? all around the world mostly in the wealthy nations only
Alexandra [31]

Answer:

A.all around the world

Explanation:

edg

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how did the economic impact of the united states government affect the relationship between settlers in the west and Native Amer
Furkat [3]

Answer:

The economic impact between the natives and the settlers greatly favored the settlers, given that they were able to buy more land from the natives, buy better weapons and have medicines that were used to invade the eastern territories. the colonists had trade routes with different regions and generated that the natives in many cases negotiated is a great disadvantage

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event happened last in the history of the Ottoman Empire?
Vlad [161]

Answer: The crowing of the Suleyman the magnificent was the last eventwhich happened in the history of the Ottoman Empire. 

In Asia Minor, Seljuks had collapsed until about 1300. Atraglia was an Ottoman chief in West Anatolia. 

At one time when he was traveling towards Asia Minor, he tried his army of four hundred horsemen on the test of fate. He supported the losing side and won the war. Those whom they gave together were Seljak. Seljak Pradhan gave Artgram a small territory as a gift. Usman, the son of ArtGuru, secured the post of Prime Minister after his father's death in 1281. In 1299 he declared himself independent. From here the Osmani kingdom was established. After this, the empire that he founded is called the Osmani empire in the name of it (this is also called Ottoman Empire in English).

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP ME ASAP!! DUE TODAY!! 100 POINTSwhich of the main reasons for secession was most important in texas decision to secede PlZ
n200080 [17]

<em>Which of the main reasons for secession was most important in Texas decision to secede?</em>

  • <em>One reason that was most important in Texas to secede in 1861, was that the election of Abraham Lincoln, who was a Republican, was going to affect the business of slavery. Slavery is the most important reason of all. Slavery was crucial to the Texan economy; slaves constituted an important part of the population after the annexation of Texas in 1845. In addition, Texans in favor of secession, influenced groups through party ties. People who did not work with slavery, favored the secession because of their ties to the Democratic party.     </em>

3 0
3 years ago
The conflict over the disputed territory between Texas and Mexico was because Texas claimed all the land up to the Nueces River
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Texas and mexico had a conflict because they couldn't decide who get to claim the Rio grande because the texas government wanted to claim it and mexico also wanted to so it became a dispute

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ottoman art included
    12·1 answer
  • Read the paragraph, which may contain errors or false beliefs about the Civil War:
    13·1 answer
  • Overproduction and underconsumption factored into causing the great depression by what
    15·1 answer
  • Why did northerners in congress accept California's application for statehood while southerners rejected it
    12·1 answer
  • The Eighth Amendment protects against
    11·2 answers
  • Approximately what is the distance between upper Egypt and lower Egypt
    6·1 answer
  • William can type 240 words in 4 minutes. How many words per minute can William type?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. How did sectionalism affect the country in Monroe's term?
    10·1 answer
  • (MC) How did President Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066 impact the US home front during World War II?
    12·1 answer
  • What musical gift did elvis receive on his 11th birthday?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!