The question above wants to analyze your ability to interpret a text and a character. This interpretation should be based on your personal way of analyzing a character. For that reason, I can't write this review for you, but I'll show you how to write it.
First of all, it is important for you to know that Beowulf is the main character of the epic "Beowulf" so to answer your question you should read the entire epic and reread it if necessary for you to understand this character.
To expedite this analysis and reading, you can search for articles that discuss how the character, Beowulf, was constructed and what he represents. These articles can be found on online research tools and literary platforms.
As you read, you will need to answer the following questions to conclude whether Beowulf is, in fact, something:
- Does Beowulf perform heroic acts?
- Does Beowulf display noble behavior?
- Does Beowulf have a noble bloodline?
- Is Beowulf a strong character?
- Is Beowulf ambitious?
- Is this ambition used for good?
- What does Beowulf's behavior say about him?
These questions must be answered with parts of the epic, which are the parts you will present to confirm your conclusion about Beowulf.
More information on the link:
brainly.com/question/577189?referrer=searchResults
Explanation:
Yet the poems final line reveals that,despite seeming to have everything he could want,Cory kills himself.The poem thematic interests in wealth,property,and elusive nature of happiness are deeply tied to its historical context:
A series of economic depression that stuck the U.S. in the 1890s
That is the answer if my book
Answer:
Fact based claim
Explanation:
Fact based claims are statements which describes how things were in the past, how they are in the present or how they will be. In this example, the increase in water pollution levels is explained to the growing amount of industrial waste being dumped into waterways
Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
