1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lina2011 [118]
3 years ago
14

In a State that does not use plurality candidate B would win the primary in which of these situations?

History
1 answer:
bazaltina [42]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

answer: A

Explanation:

The right answer is A, where <em>candidate A</em> receives 15%, <em>candidate B</em> 55% and <em>candidate C</em> receives 30%.

<em>Candidate B</em> won in this situation, because the other two candidates combined received the total of 45% of the votes, while candidate B received 55% of the votes.

In this case, <em>candidate B</em>, in order to win, must receive more votes than the other two candidates combined.

You might be interested in
Why did the united states remain neutral when world war i first broke out?
Kaylis [27]
Woodrow Wilson urged Americans to be “impartial in thought as well as in action.” When considering getting involved in WWI. "However, America's neutrality was soon tested on what the U.S. considered free international waters."
5 0
3 years ago
Two consequences of development of ranching on the plains 1866-76
andrezito [222]
Loose the land for other things and then starts more land and room for slavery
6 0
3 years ago
Do you think everyone in America could afford to build a fallout shelter ? explain .
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

No, because there are people homeless and like ethan crumbly's parents who are deeply in debt.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
One risk of the government restricting citizens’ Second-Amendment right to bear arms might be which of the following selections?
cluponka [151]

The answer is: A

The Second Amendment states the right of an individual to own a firearm as well as the right to form a regulated militia.

As such, we can deduct that the purpose of the amendment was made to not only protect an individual's right to own a firearm, but in case of an unjust regime, be able to fight against it through the use of said firearms.

Restricting a citizen's right to own a firearm, will in turn decrease the ability of citizens to stand up against an unjust regime.



5 0
3 years ago
Which would most likely hold a fundraising campaign to elect a pro-gun senator? a chamber of commerce a group of individuals a s
docker41 [41]

Answer:

A special interest group.

Explanation:

Edge

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The 5th amendment prevents the federal government from depriving a person of
    11·2 answers
  • In what way was the Byzantine today empire a departure from the Roman Empire
    14·1 answer
  • Cuba and what country were the last to abolish slavery in the Americas
    9·2 answers
  • Who was the scientist to propose that species change over time
    10·1 answer
  • Were native americans justified in leaving the reservation and refusing further relocation by the government
    12·1 answer
  • Which are features of the Greater New Orleans region? Check all that apply.
    12·1 answer
  • What are 2 ways in which mussolini and hitler were different?
    6·1 answer
  • The Taft-Hartley Act intended to do which of the following?. .A. curb the laws that gave too much power to union leaders. B. gra
    11·1 answer
  • Why were people drawn to settle in Rich Bar?
    6·1 answer
  • Who issued the proclamation stating when to fly the flag at half-staff? when did this happen?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!