Answer: Erickson's second stage of development- Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt
Explanation:
According to Erickson's theory of psychosocial development Christian is accomplishing tasks associated with The second stage of development- Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt which takes place usually from 18 months to three years.
In this stage, children develop a sense of independence and willful exploration and sense of personal control. They can perform little tasks on their own and take decisions on what they prefer to also parents and guardians can help then develop autonomy by allowing them make their choices.
If they are discouraged or scolded for mistakes in courses of thier actions, may develop shame and doubt and struggle with a sense of personal control.
Answer:
The development of robust institutions is the most important proposal I can make in terms of human rights breaches on governments and communities. Independent Courts and Commissions dealing with specific topics such as corruption and gender issues are required. The environment should allow for a free press to operate without political intervention or impediment. Citizens should have the right to freedom of expression and association. Citizens must also be well-informed and engaged on all major topics.
To put it another way, an activist citizenry should be nurtured and supported. Transparency, open participation, peace, stability, and inclusive development are the main characteristics that drive a democratic discourse, and these approaches have a net effect of promoting them.
Explanation:
I'll start with the second question - it's definitely Yugoslavia. Right now there is a talk about what Hilary Clinton did in Bosnia - it was during this time- this is just one way in which you can remember this. I was mostly the ethnic clensing of Bosnians by the Serbians.
Now, the first question. Let's look at the options:
A. Too much regulation would attract illegal immigrants.
-no, there is no reason why it would attract immigrants
B. Environmental laws didn't work lo clean the environment.
-that's not true- they most often do
C. Too much regulation would clean the water.
yes, but that's a good thing!
D. Too much regulation could hurt businesses
-this is the correct answer. It's an actual criticism that is often found.
Answer: Negatively
Explanation:
Enlightenment ideas were not completely against monarchs but did have problems with the absolute nature of the rule of said monarchs.
Before Enlightenment, monarchs generally ruled as they pleased with the logic being that they had the right to rule from God and so had the right to control the nation as their personal property.
Enlightenment was against this and instead espoused the logic that a monarch was only able to rule due to a social contract signed between them and the people whereby they would be allowed to rule provided they took care of their subjects.
Monarchs reacted to this with negativity because it meant that they had to stop being so selfish with resources and had to share power with the people. As time went on however, and with constant pressure on them, they had to relent and it led to the dissolution of several monarchies in Europe and the transition of others to Constitutional Monarchies.
