The exclusion of important details and facts,the presentation of all viewpoints seem to be a likely outcome of bias in the media.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There will be many types of events that comes to the notice of media. Some of them will be more important than others. There will be some confusion that exists for a person of media to choose which event to be published and which is to be omitted and this refers to Media bias. This may be a simple or a complicated one.
When some of the important facts are omitted this will cause some disputes. The main outcome of media bias may be excluding some of the information that are more important. The next may be the presentation of all viewpoints. There may be many viewpoints that are related to a particular event and choosing which one will be a bias.
Answer:
CEO duality results in improved leadership efficiency and effectiveness
Explanation:
Unity of command school of thought holds the position that a subordinate reports/answers to only one supervisor, who in turn is responsible to only one supervisor, and in that order all the way up the organizational hierarchy regardless of whether the top management of the organization is led by a group of people. Unity of Command school of thought does not support CEO duality.
Answer:
c. An investigation
Explanation:
During the inquiry, if there is sufficient evidence that there has been a research misconduct, the next phase is the investigation phase. The stage involves the full scale investigation of all accusations and the gathering of facts.
The correct answer would be option B.
Beth was not Injured.
Explanation:
Negligence theory is a theory that talks about the failure of exercising the amount of care a person can show that a person with ordinary wisdom would have exercised in the same circumstances, situations or conditions.
So in this given example, when Caleb was driving a car and Beth was sitting with him, they met an accident. They both were emotionally rattled but non of them got hurt.
So according to negligence theory, Caleb is not liable to Beth, because Beth was not injured or hurt physically. If he would have hurt or injured due to the negligence of Caleb, then Caleb was responsible and liable to Beth.
Learn more about Negligence theory at:
brainly.com/question/8098652
#LearnWithBrainly
