1 kings, 1 chronicles, and Isaiah.
Answer:
Family life cycle
Explanation:
Family life cycle
The family life cycle is a progression of stages through which a family may sit back. Average arranges in family improvement incorporate the times of a solitary youthful grown-up, a recently hitched couple, a family with small kids, a family with young people, propelling the kids, and a family in later life
Hey, please mark as brainleist! ☺☺
The correct answer would be Jacques Cartier!
Hope that helps!! ☻
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
Throwing the paper was a provocation.
Explanation:
Provocation is defined in the dictionary as: an action intended to cause a reaction, especially anger or annoyance.
Frank's behaviour reveals that he wanted attention, he knew he would gain it by making people laugh , he also knew that flinging the paper airplane would be a very provocative act as Mr. Curtis wouldn't tolerate it, so the whole act of flinging the paper was a provocation because he wanted to infurate the teacher to make people laugh and ultimately gaining attention.
