The major cause of the Great Depression was the collapse of the stock market.
<h3>What is Great Depression?</h3>
Great Depression refers to the economic breakdown of the united states in 1929 and 1939 which led to the serious recession in the economy. This incident took first time in the history of the industrialization.
The economic breakdown began with the crash in the Stock markets where millions of the people had their investment and it led to the panic situation in the Wall streets.
The depression led to the fall in the production of the output and which raised the prices of the commodity. There was the tremendous increase in the level of unemployment.
Learn more about the Great depression here:
brainly.com/question/27291778
#SPJ1
The climate was an important cause<span> of the </span>dust bowl<span>. The climate of the Great Plain's region is dry and windy; winds reached the speed of 60 mph. Scientists believed that drought which </span>caused the dust bowl<span> to take place occurred because it happened same time as La Nina event in the Pacific Ocean.</span>
Modern U.S. presidents are fully aware of the importance of the economy. More than ever, the pulse of the nation’s economy is of the utmost importance for the White House.
In a global scenario, the role of economics through trade has been increasingly important. The president of the U.S. dedicates a considerable part of his time to oversee the Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasure and is very aware of the declarations of Federal Reserve and the bankers, to avoid a crisis like the one that happened in 2008
Oh jeez, i dunno man-
but, what im thinking is that the satanists 'n stuff might win, due to the fact that they pretty much have every form of evil on their side ig
hecc im still not too sure tho
Answer:
B. Put less work in, get more work out
Explanation:
Efficiency means that you want to maximize something with putting little in. With this, the only answer that would make sense would be B.
If you were to put more work in and get less work out that would not be efficient at all. It would be the complete opposite.
If you were to put less work in and get less work out that is still inefficient.
If you put more work in and get more work out that could appear as efficient, but you are still putting in a lot of work which is not efficient.
Thus the best answer would be B. Put less work in, get more work out.
Hope this helps!! Ask questions if you need!
