Incurring actual indirect factory wages in excess of budgeted amounts for actual production results in a controllable variance. Therefore, the option B holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of controllable variance?</h3>
Controllable variance can be referred to or considered as a variance that computes the difference between the actual quantity and the budgeted quantity sold or consumed by a firm in an economy. It can never be deficit, and is always in surplus of the budgeted amounts.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of controllable variance.
Learn more about controllable variance here:
brainly.com/question/13985361
#SPJ4
The question seems to be incomplete. It has been added below for better reference.
Incurring actual indirect factory wages in excess of budgeted amounts for actual production results in a:
a. quantity variance
b. controllable variance
c. volume variance
d. rate variance
Answer:
Bundles A B C D
Concert Tickets 80 60 20 0
Books 0 50 150 200
Explanation:
Since each concert ticket costs $25,
- if Sam spends $2,000 on concert tickets, he will purchase 80 tickets
- if he spends $1,500 on concert tickets, he will purchase 60 tickets
- if he spends $500 on concert tickets, he will purchase 20 tickets
Since each concert ticket costs $10,
- if Sam spends $2,000 on books, he will purchase 200 books
- if he spends $1,500 on books, he will purchase 150 books
- if he spends $500 on books, he will purchase 50 books
In this case the perfect tender rule
b. does not apply.
Explanation:
The perfect tender rule has certain exceptions where it cannot be applied to the tender parties and the probates of the tender.
If there is a government ruling against the use of certain products that are necessary for the tender to be completed and the outlaw happens after the tender is signed but before it is completed as a consignment then it cannot be done.
This would come under the ambit of an emergency where the governed ruling makes such deals null and void.
Answer:
E: a debt of $10.7 trillion and a deficit of zero.
Explanation:
Deficits are usually financed by debt. Here the government has incurred an extra debt of $700 billion. The previous debt of $10 trillion may have been due to any reason and not necessarily deficit. However, the passage does not state if the extra debt is due to deficit or not. So it is safe to select option E.
Hence, the government has incurred a total debt of $10.7 trillion and a deficit of zero.
Answer:
A farmer is the one that owns the cattle and is ready to sell it on the market demand, while the meatpacker is the one who buys the product and sells it in different parts to the end consumers.
Since they both are using the commodity market to reduce the risk, the farmer will be the one who agrees to sell the cattle in the future at a fixed rate, while the meatpacker will be the one who agrees to buy the cattle in the future at a specified price fixed by him.
Hope this helps. ThankYou.
