The choice that best explains how Garcia's word choice helps establish her voice in the excerpt is: C. Garcia uses short, forceful words to assert a pessimistic opinion on fate.
In the writing above, we find that Garcia used short phrases separated by commas to paint a pessimistic opinion about the fate of a former baseball player.
The use of words like frustrated and wicked paint a pessimistic picture about the fate of the player.
Learn more about pessimism here:
brainly.com/question/8007300
Answer:
<em>To evaluate the effectiveness of an argument the reader needs to check if the read and evidences of the author are true and if the logic used in the argument is valid.</em>
Explanation:
The effectiveness of an argument will depend first in the premises, if they are true or false, in this stage you should check sources, facts and evidences to see how reliable is it. The second stage is to check the logic applied, many arguments had false reasoning, which make then invalid or what it is called logic fallacies. If an argument is valid but the premises are not true it won’t be an effective argument, is the premises are true but the logic applied is not correct it won’t be an effective argument too.
Answer:
This last one takes out Ivan, and Raisnford also manages to kill one of Zaroff’s precious hounds. But then, with nowhere left to go, Rainsford hurls himself over a cliff into the stormy waters below. Zaroff figures that’s the end of that and goes home to bed.
And then, double-surprise! Rainsford is in his bedroom. He’s alive, he's mad, and he's out for revenge, Zaroff concedes that Rainsford has won and tries to let him go free—but that’s not good enough for this American hunter. He feeds his host to the hounds and hits the hay for a good night's sleep.
The end.
Explanation:
five star?
Answer:
the image of light.
Explanation:
honestly, I don't know but the others weren't being mentioned in the paragraph.
