1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following is not correct? a. The producer who requires a smaller quantity of inputs to produce a good is said to ha

ve an absolute advantage in producing that good. b. The producer who gives up less of other goods to produce Good X has the smaller opportunity cost of producing Good X. c. The producer who has the smaller opportunity cost of producing a good is said to have a comparative advantage in producing that good. d. The gains from specialization and trade are based not on comparative advantage but on absolute advantage.
Business
1 answer:
SCORPION-xisa [38]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

b. The producer who gives up less of other goods to produce Good X has the smaller opportunity cost of producing Good X

Explanation:

<u>The opportunity cost is the cost of the best alternative.</u>

In this case, the producer uses factors (labor, raw materials, capital) to produce good X. His opportunity cost is the goods he would produce instead of good X.

A producer who gives up less of the other goods means his best alternative is lower than one who gives up more.

<em>For example</em>

if a producer can do

10 good X

or 50 of good Y

The opportunity cost for good X is 5 units of Y

if another producer can do

10 good X

or 20 of good Y

The opportunity cost of good X is 2 units of Y

For this second producer, it is more feasible to produce X than the first producer. It renounces to fewer unis of good Y

You might be interested in
Bark Company is considering buying a machine for $240,000 with an estimated life of ten years and no salvage value. The straight
cupoosta [38]

Answer:

option (c) 8 years

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Cost of the machine = $240,000

Useful life = 10 years

Salvage value = 0

Net income = $6,000 each year

Now,

Using the straight-line method of depreciation

Annual depreciation = [ Cost - Salvage value ] ÷ Useful life

= [ $240,000 - 0 ] ÷ 10

= $24,000

Thus,

Cash flow = $6,000 + $24,000

= $30,000

Therefore,

The payback period = ( Cost ) ÷ ( Cash flow )

= $240,000 ÷ $30,000

= 8 years

Hence,

the correct answer is option (c) 8 years

3 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answers. Which strategy would be most suitable for a company at the maturity stage of its product life cycle?
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

E decrease the product price

Explanation:

Maturity stage of the product is the stage where the product has already saturated in the market and sales begin to peak and slow down. Many companies will want to maintain this stage when it peaks but when the decline starts showing up it is a great challenge for them due to competition that cuts in from other companies.  so companies at maturity stage would want to adopt  the method of decreasing the price of the product in order  to fight off competition.

3 0
3 years ago
If company A has higher TEI than company B, then company A has than company B
Anna007 [38]

its all da same because it just a company

3 0
3 years ago
What is the admirals feast for red lobster
jekas [21]

Answer:

Admiral's Feast Tuesday—Red Lobster's take on a classic fish fry. Enjoy Walt's Favorite Shrimp, bay scallops, clam strips and wild-caught flounder—all fried until perfectly crisp and golden

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Sally’s parents deposited $15,000 into a college savings account on her third birthday. The account had an interest rate of 9.6%
kozerog [31]

Answer:

The correct option is yes,the $15,000 will double each 7.5 years.In 15 years ,it will double twice.

Explanation:

The 72 rule stipulates that the number of years it would take an investment to achieve accumulate a certain amount- future value, can be computed by dividing 72 by the interest rate earns by the investment

N, the number of years=72/9.6

                                      =7.5 years

Invariably,in 7.5 years' when Sally would have been 10.5 years(3 years now+7.5 years) the investment would have doubled.

By another 7.5 years when Sally would have been 18 years(10.5 years +7.5 years), the investment would have doubled twice.

The 72 rule is fast-track approach to calculating the duration of an investment.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who is the current public protector of s.a?
    6·1 answer
  • How has globalization contributed to the need for diversity awareness in our organizations?
    13·1 answer
  • Help with question six please
    14·1 answer
  • Warren Enterprises had the following events during Year 1 The business issued $34,000 of common stock to its stockholders The bu
    10·1 answer
  • Kiara filled out a life insurance application and was given a policy illustration that showed future premiums being paid out of
    12·1 answer
  • Companies engaged in a single line of business most commonly utilize an organizational structure that can be A. a functional (de
    5·1 answer
  • Mario is an avid collector of Major League Baseball memorabilia. He greatly desires to own the "special" bat that earned the slu
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a component included in a standard business plan?
    6·1 answer
  • The salary of the project manager and temporary rental space for the project team would be classified as __________ costs.
    7·1 answer
  • __________ refers to phishing with a specific, high-value target in mind. for example, the attacker may target the president or
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!