According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, freedom of expression<span> is the right of every individual to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.</span>
Answer:"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your COUNTRY can do for you – ask what you can do for your COUNTRY.
Explanation:In this way the president's was intentionally challenging that people need to do something in their society in order to benefit the public instead of focusing to self and what each individual needs.
This is a call for people to be selfless and stop trying to gain everything for just themselves without thinking about other people and other people's struggles .
It a challenge not to wait for the government to perform so that one can gain but to actual do something that can benefit other people in the society without waiting for the government to do that.
Answer:
Limited supply. Plz mark brainliest.
Explanation:
Answer:
Orphaned by the American War of Independence, Jackson became a prisoner of war at the age of 13. When he refused to clean a British officer's boots, the soldier slashed him across the forehead with his sword, scarring him for life. ... Jackson sent the Cherokees on the Trail of Tears.
Explanation:
I don't normally copy and paste answers... but I wanted to make sure I didn't give any incorrect info :)
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
