Answer: Slaves in states that were in rebellion against the Union.
Historical context/details:
President Abraham Lincoln issued The Emancipation Proclamation as an executive order on January 1, 1863. The executive order declared freedom for slaves in ten Confederate states in rebellion against the Union. It also allowed that freed slaves could join the Union Army to fight for the cause of reuniting the nation and ending slavery. As summarized by the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, "The Proclamation broadened the goals of the Union war effort; it made the eradication of slavery into an explicit Union goal, in addition to the reuniting of the country."
While Lincoln personally was strongly against slavery, he had to tread carefully in his role as president and commander-in-chief. The Emancipation Proclamation was carefully worded in order to retain the support of four border slave states, which remained in the Union though they were states that permitted slavery, were Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, and Kentucky. Lincoln wanted to keep those states loyal to the Union cause.
The Emancipation Proclamation was also a way of blocking foreign support for the Confederate cause. According to the American Battlefield Trust, "Britain and France had considered supporting the Confederacy in order to expand their influence in the Western Hemisphere. However, many Europeans were against slavery." Britain had abolished slavery in its territories in 1833. France had put a final end to slavery in its territories in 1848. So when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, it also served as a foreign policy action to keep European powers out of the US Civil War, according to Steve Jones, professor of history at Southwestern Adventist University.
Answer:
- The new political climate in the United States Supreme Court meant that a federal child labor ban could stand constitutional muster.
Explanation / historical context
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was eager to implement his New Deal programs as an antidote to the Great Depression. However, the US Supreme Court had already ruled that some provisions of the New Deal were unconstitutional, because they took too much power into the hands of the federal government, especially the executive branch of the federal government. So, riding the momentum of his landslide reelection victory in 1936, in February of 1937, FDR proposed a plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges. The plan offered to provide full pay to justices over age 70 who would retire. If the older justices didn't retire, assistant justices (with full voting rights) would be appointed to sit with those existing justices. This was a way FDR hoped to give the court a liberal majority that would side with his programs.
As it turned out, before FDR's proposal came up for a vote in Congress, two of the sitting justices came over to his side of the argument, and the Supreme Court narrowly approved as constitutional both the Social Security Act and the National Labor Relations Act. So the court packing plan became unnecessary to his purposes.
Child labor was regulated by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. In a unanimous decision in <em>United States v. Darby Lumber Co</em>. (1941), the US Supreme Court upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The Court ruled that Congress had power, under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, to regulate employment conditions.
Answer:
D Scientists
Explanation:
because Scientists researched problems and let people know about
Answer:Your answer is the 3rd one and your mom
Explanation:
<em>Free Appropriate Public Education for Students with Disabilities, Requirements Under </em><em>Section 504</em><em> of the </em><em>Rehabilitation Act of 1973</em>.
<u>https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/edlite-FAPE504.html</u>