Answer:
Correct answer is C. East Germany adopted a communist government while West Germany maintained Democratic influence.
Explanation:
Option C is the only correct answer as after WW2 Germany was divided into Eastern part, which was under influence of Soviet Union and Western part which was under influence of United States, Britain and France.
A therefore cannot be correct as both options are not correct. East Germany wasn't liberal, West Germany didn't had single party system.
B is not correct as there was no capitalism in East Germany and there was no state control in West Germany. It was the other way around.
D is not correct as there was no colonialism after WW2, while there was no totalitarianism, but democracy in West Germany.
<span>By the beginning of the First World War, the world population was about 1.6 billion. Europe and North America controlled 84 % of the land surface. There were only 35 independent countries and almost half of them were in the Americas. Asia had the largest part of world`s population : about 60% and around 390 million of its inhabitants lived in colonies. Also the whole Africa was colonized ( about 4.5 % of the world population ). Therefore we can calculate that about 33 % of the world`s population lived in colony. Answer: C ) one-third.</span>
Here is the full name list for this question:
<span>George McClellan
Henry Halleck
Joseph Hookker
George Meade
</span>????
I believe the answer is: <span>Ulysses S. Grant
All the name above are the generals who fought for the union side. From the name above, </span><span>Ulysses Simpson Grant probably held in highest regard due to his huge contribution in defeating the confederate army. As a reward, President Abraham Lincoln made him the commander of all the generals.</span>
Rich, higher level people, specifically plantation owners.
The overall trend of spending during presidential campaigns since the 1960´s has shown an enormous increase. The explanation resides in various factors: - inflation (change of the value of the dollar, making necessary more dollars to achieve the same); -also the equation that there are more inhabitants, meaning, more donors. - Since the income of the people increased, there is also more money to donate.