Answer:
She is blind because of her past experiences as a trapeze artist.
Explanation:
Answer:
You might be highly frustrated today. But it's a good life anyway.
<em>For example,</em> people might cheat you, lie to you, and blame you for problems they themselves create. Even so, life has infinite capacity for goodness and fulfillment.
<em>Furthermore, </em>a whole lot of things cause you a whole lot of trouble. Yet when you step back and take a good, clear look, you see without question that life is well worth the trouble.
<em>Therefore,</em> it's all too easy to imagine sometimes that things are hopeless. But then you remember you've survived a lot worse, and in fact thrived, and so have many, many others.
<em>So,</em> yes, at times life is tough. And it is precisely those times that enable you to see how very good life can be.
<em>In conclusion,</em> whatever the situation, life is good when you decide it is good. And it's your decision to make right now.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Dr. Dowell says that we need to be prepared for a pandemic. He thinks every nation should have an emergency plan. More medications like Tamiflu should be available. He thinks rich countries like the U.S. should help poor countries pay for medicine and health care.
Why does the author most likely include this information at the end of the text instead of at the beginning?
A. because it draws a conclusion based on the evidence presented throughout the text
B. because it offers new evidence that is meant to help readers better understand the text
C. because it poses new questions for readers to think about now that they have read the text
D. because it offers supplemental information that readers can compare to evidence presented in the text
Answer:
The author includes this information at the end of the text:
A. because it draws a conclusion based on the evidence presented throughout the text
.
Explanation:
After discussing and presenting evidence throughout the text, author John DiConsiglio is now ready to conclude it. What he presents at the end cannot be new evidence or supplemental information, for that would not be a conclusion at all. He is also not presenting questions - he is making statements. Those statements are based on the information presented previously, supported by it. What the author wants now is to show how important that information was and how we can use it to be prepared for future cases of the disease.
To make sure that the teacher can understand your paragraphs is what she means. Hope this helps! ;)
