1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MAVERICK [17]
3 years ago
14

30 Points Please Help :D

History
2 answers:
olasank [31]3 years ago
4 0
Eurycleia is the faithful servant who recognises Odysseus because of a scar on his leg. 

Philoetius is the faithful cowherd of Odysseus.

Leodes is the first of the suitors to try the bow. 

Iphitus is the friend of Odysseus who gave him the bow.

Antinous is the worst of all suitors. 

<em>Hope this helped! :)</em>

kondaur [170]3 years ago
3 0
What is ur question?
You might be interested in
Facism and nazism in Europe during the 1920s and 1930s may best be characterized as
enot [183]
Facism and Nazism developed out of a general crisis of the European political system connected with the rise of the mass participation state from the late nineteenth century to the end of World War I. The mass participation state was marked by five features: an unprecedented expansion of the number of voters brought on by universal manhood suffrage and in some cases by the extension of the vote to women; the development of mass communications; a high degree of mass mobilization, initially by revolutionary socialist parties; new economic and social demands put forward by democratic and revolutionary organizations; and fragmented, poorly organized middle-class political party structures, largely legacies of the nineteenth-century restricted franchise. Fascism was motivated by deep-seated fears of social and political disintegration and of political revolution on the part of both ruling elites and large sectors of the middle and lower-middle classes. These classes had little to gain from a socialist revolution. Fascist and Nazi movements appeared throughout Europe during the period between World Wars I and II, but only in Italy and Germany did they come to power and develop into regimes.
3 0
3 years ago
I need help and fast and the rite answer please
PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

King Leopold of Belgium grew wealthy by colonizing Congo and brutally forcing people to collect rubber

The Industrial Revolution started around 1750

The Industrial Revolution started in Great Britain

The invention of the steam engine powered machines and allowed factories to be located anywhere

4 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0
4 years ago
1.) What was the Kansas-Nebraska Act? Write one or two sentences.
Julli [10]

Answer: 1. 1854 bill that mandated popular sovereignty. It allowed settlers to decide if they wanted slavery in their state or not.

2. The North was very very very mad. The Missouri Compromise had made this from happening all the way back in 1820.

3. It was greatly praised. But anti slave people in the South wanted another vote. But pro slave people didn't vote because they wanted to keep slavery.

4. President Franklin Pierce

5. It allowed people to decide for themselves and they didn't have to like slavery

Explanation: Brainliest please

5 0
3 years ago
Which act required Native Americans to move to territory in the west?
V125BC [204]
The Indian Removal Act of 1830
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 10.
    13·2 answers
  • What was the most immediate effect of the spread of radio broadcasting on American society?
    6·1 answer
  • What are the nicknames of Mesopotamia?
    11·2 answers
  • The reagan administration ordered the cia to aid the contras, an opposition group opposed to the democratically elected sandinis
    6·1 answer
  • Why do many people consider the Great Leap Forward to have been a failure?
    13·2 answers
  • HELP NEEDED :)
    15·1 answer
  • Where is george Washington's home​
    12·1 answer
  • 15.
    15·1 answer
  • America was very different during George Washington's
    14·1 answer
  • - The Whiskey Rebellion
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!