Answer:
1. This is an expository article. This can be seen through the author's attempt to provide evidence to readers based on scientific and confirmed analyzes, where he literally exposes the topic in question, explaining it impartially and informing the reader.
2. The central idea is to expose the certainty that some Puritans have that they still exist and are influential in America, being part of American society.
3. To justify this perception of the Puritans, Hudson shows how the Puritans justify that many cultural points and customs present in America today are based on Puritan habits.
4. To explain a specific idea about Puritans believing they are still influential today, Hutson shows that many ideas from influential Puritans like Martin Luther and John Calvin are currently being encouraged, to confirm this, he shows that research has already been done with students from two universities that prove that the concepts of these two men are still taken seriously within society. I do not fully agree with Hutson's view because the research he cites in the article only represents a very small part of the population, which is not enough to represent American society.
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest.
Many words are formed by adding prefixes or suffixes to the beginning or end of the root of the word. The root of a word is usually not a stand-alone word. For example, the word "reject" is formed using the prefix "re" and the Latin root "ject" which is not the stand-alone word. It's similar to adding suffixes. There are indeed many Greek and Latin prefixes, roots and suffixes that are in everyday use and we are not even aware. For example, the Latin roots are: forms, multi, ambi, scribes, cent etc. Some of the Greek roots are: hetero, bio, gram, graph, pseudo etc. Then the prefixes: anti, de, over, semi, sub, trans, etc. Suffixes: able, ful, ing, ness, less, ed, etc. It is estimated that there are thousands of such prefixes, roots and suffixes.
At the end of the poem, hope is lost too soon, before the time is right.
We can reach this conclusion because:
- The poem is a great analogy about communism's invasion of Vietnam.
- In the poem, hope is represented by the papaya, which is not ripe enough to be picked.
- Some people want to cut the papaya, even before the right time, to prevent the communists from taking it.
- However, others feel that papaya should be cut when it is fully ripe, as everyone deserves it, including children.
- However, the papaya is cut early in a sad and melancholy way, as it is not ready to be eaten.
In that case, we can conclude that just like the papaya in the poem, some people cut hope out of their hearts very quickly towards the fight against communism and ended up leaving Vietnam too soon, before the right time, which was a sad and melancholic situation.
More information:
brainly.com/question/24742609?referrer=searchResults
