1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexeev081 [22]
3 years ago
14

Why have most Indians settled in the coastal regions and the Indo-Gangetic Plain?

History
2 answers:
Mariana [72]3 years ago
6 0
<span>A) Much of the rest of India is not well suited for human habitation. 

India has three geographic regions: The Indo-Gangetic Plain, the Deccan Plateau and the Himalayas. The coastal regions can be considered a fourth region. The Himalaya region is not well suited for human habitation. 
</span><span>
</span>
AlladinOne [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Much of the rest of India is not well suited for human habitation.

<em>- Prodixy</em>

You might be interested in
How did President Monroe's message influence U.S. foreign policy? (4.1)
Gwar [14]

President Monroe's message influences U.S. foreign policy by  warning the European nations not to interfere in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.

Monroe Doctrine was policy adopted by President Monroe to influence the nation foreign policy.

  • Monroe Doctrine provides that any intervention by external powers in the politics of the U.S is a potentially hostile act against the US.

In conclusion, the Option D is correct because his message influences the U.S. foreign policy by  warning the European nations not to interfere in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.

Read more about Monroe Doctrine

<em>brainly.com/question/16459348</em>

3 0
2 years ago
How did marbury v. madison illustrate the supreme court's power of judicial review?
Leno4ka [110]
It did not establish judicial review. Judicial review had been used in state courts and lower federal courts prior to Marbury, and ruled a number of times that some laws were unconstitutional. In fact, even the Supreme Court used judicial review before Marbury to decide that a carriage tax was constitutional (Hylton v. United States). 

However, Marbury was the first case that the Supreme Court used to rule a law unconstitutional. They declared that a part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which gave the US Supreme Court court original jurisdiction over writs of mandamus. The Court ruled that Congress does not have the authority to modify the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, therefore, it was unconstitutional.

<span>In a way, by doing so, the Supreme Court actually took away some of it's power that Congress had granted it because the Constitution did not grant Congress that power.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
people ability to express their will varies depending on their country's form of government. how do the governments of japan, no
MissTica

The full answerisin the document attached, this is just a preview since there is a character limit.

Psragraph...

After analyzing the three states, there a lot of conclusions that can be made. First of all, these states have a division of power. There are different organs, responsible for ruling over different matters. Philippines, on one side, is a more liberal State on its formation; its constitution contains a bill of rights, belonging those to some universal principles, such as but not limited to, habeas corpus and due process. On the other hand, North Korea has division of power as well, being the Supreme People´s Assembly the legislative power, the Presidium, responsible for regulating the power and duties of the SPA, and administering Justice at a National level. People  in North Korea do have rights and liberties, for example, work, education and health are granted rights, there is freedom of speech and religion,  there are elections, and some others, but what makes a difference between this and the other states is that the basis of the exercise of these rights is collective, not individual and this can be a limitation.  

The advantages of the socialist system in North Korea is that in theory, there should not be differences between people, but most importantly, there is a spirit of modernism and transformation thru the state, that´s an interesting view and an advantage: the people, collectively will build the country, and take it to a perfect place for everyone thru science and education, which is free from kindergarten to university. But the main disadvantage is that this model is not compatible with the rest of the world and it drives the nation to isolation, because they base their model in cultural principles which are not negotiable, such as Chongsanri spirit, which in short words is a model of inspiring people to work for the nation´s sake, not for a material compensation, which in western societies might be taken as deeply unfair.

On the other hand, Japan´s model is certainly a western-like constitutional model and similar to the Philippines, being some of the advantages that Japan grants free education to all its citizens, something that does not happen in Philippines, as their bill of rights focuses on individual freedoms and those rights which regulate the relationship between the state and the individuals, for example, the right to a speedy trial or not to incriminate oneself. Japan declares peace is one of their fundamental principles and that is the reason why Japan resigned to war or to use force to solve any further conflict. This is an advantage, because for a country, resigning to war means to dedicate in other efforts for the good of their citizens.  

Type of Government...

Each country has both similarities and differences. The second ones are more related with the names of the organisms which intervene in the government process, but the main duties are quite the same. Constitutionally speaking, North Korea is not a dictatorship taking into account that everything in the country belongs to its citizens, and that people can be elected as early as 17 years old to any position in the government. But the leader represents the foundation of the country, hence the nation,  and the leader are somewhat blended, and this is the reason why this position is actually inherited, so this is certainly a dictatorship in the practice, although their Constitution says that everything belongs to everyone and that the real power are the people.

Japan is a constitutional monarchy. The Emperor represents the unity of the people, in short words, he rules only on behalf of the people, and that is actually the source of his power: people, not a divine rule as it was in the past, when he used to be the son of the sun or some kind of semi god.  He has the authority to sign regulations and decrees, for example, but there is a Prime Minister, head of the executive branch, who is the head of the government, and there is also a Supreme Court and a Diet, which has the duties of a congress, composed by two houses.

As of the Philippines, it is a democracy, a republican form of state with its power divided in three branches, in which the head of the state is the President and the judiciary is under the control of the Supreme Court and the legislative branch is in charge of the Congress and Senate.            

To what extent can the people participate in the governing process of each country?

The participation in politics is equally granted in each one of these states; in North Korea, people can be elected to local or national Assembly, that is a constitutional right, similarly as it happens in the Philippines and Japan, where the right to suffrage is granted in the Constitution. This certainly, can be undermined by different local factors, such as corruption, lack of political parties or difficulties to access to the government or influence in decisions taken.    

Classification...


had to write so much but hope this helped ;(

3 0
3 years ago
Who received the second largest number of electoral votes in the 1796 election
marissa [1.9K]

During the election of 1796 Thomas Jefferson received the second largest amount of votes with 68 votes.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first nation in Europe to give all men the right to vote was
ira [324]

Answer:

The first nation in Europe to give all men the right to vote was france

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • At the top of the system of inequality in the former soviet union were the ________
    13·1 answer
  • ¨might makes right¨ is a statement that might be heard______.
    5·2 answers
  • Which is not a reason for the government to provide a good or services as a public
    11·2 answers
  • Which event led most directly to the bataan death march
    6·2 answers
  • During which clash, before colonists declared independence from Britain, did the American rebels succeed in conquering the Briti
    8·1 answer
  • What contributions did the Babylonians make?
    14·1 answer
  • 100 POINTS WHOEVER GETS THIS RIGHT
    14·1 answer
  • The prophets of Baal were put in prison.<br><br> True<br> False
    7·1 answer
  • Solusyon sa kawalan ng seguridad sa pinapasukang kompanya​
    13·1 answer
  • Which body of water is identified by the letter H on the map?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!