In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
The simplified expression is 
Explanation:
The expression that we have in this problem is

We want to simplify this expression: in order to do so, we apply the rule to solve the square of a binomial:

Where in our expression, we have:

So, the various terms are:

Therefore, the final expression becomes

Learn more about simplify expressions:
brainly.com/question/7014769
brainly.com/question/11007572
brainly.com/question/11334714
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
I think it's B. The stench of rotten eggs attacked us as we drive by.
Explanation:
I think this because this sentence makes the reader picture the scene and imagine what's happening which is imagery.
Hope this helps :D
Answer:
The 3rd one
Explanation:
She is think back to her lonely father she misses him a lot
Answer:
her attitude and behavior change as a slaveholder.
Explanation: