1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rusak2 [61]
4 years ago
13

"Decisions take much longer because the people have a say in them." In which section of the chart would you place this statement

?
History
1 answer:
SIZIF [17.4K]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

F. Disadvantage of Democracy.

Explanation:

The fact that decisions take much longer because the people have a say in them is a disadvantage of democracy since the process implied is fairly slow. Voting is one of the most essential ways to participate in a democratic organization or government. However, it requires a time-consuming process to reach any decision.  

Hope this helps...please vote and thanks

You might be interested in
Help plz ppl this is so stu.pid i hate the questions like this .................
Mkey [24]
“suddenly they heard growling and braking” is my take
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would some mesoamerica societies have allied with the spanish conquistadores against the aztecs? a. the spanish promised to
MatroZZZ [7]
The correct answer is ( C ) - The Aztecs had conquered their territories and forced them to pay tributes.
8 0
3 years ago
Conduct Internet research and read the original letter that Chief John Ross wrote to President Lincoln in an effort to assuage h
aleksklad [387]

Chief John Ross wants to assure President Lincoln that his and the Cherokee people's loyalty laid with the Union. He also expresses how Cherokee and the U.S are tied together by a series of treaties based on friendship and alliance to receive protection from the United States and no other sovereign. He affirms that despite having to reach an agreement with the confederates, people were still supporters of the Union and they showed so when the Indian Expedition took place in 1862 and how they manifest their support by fighting under the Union flag. Chief Ross was a defendant of neutrality during the Civil war, unfortunately he couldn't maintain this position and the pressure from other tribal leaders regarding their participation in the Civil War given the history they had with the north after the Trail of Tears forced relocation, most Cherokees were siding more with southern policies.  

With this letter, Ross wants to express to President Lincoln that he supports the United States of America and in exchange asks him not to abandon the Cherokee people, to honor former agreements and to protect people's life and property.

3 0
3 years ago
Which country lost the most from the French and Indian War that began in 1754
svet-max [94.6K]
The French and Indian war tool a lot of lives indeed than the American Revolution. It also involved a lot of countries, but the one that lost the most was France as they were able to lose their foothold in 1760.
8 0
4 years ago
The british theory of mercantilism by which the colonies were governed held that
Vlad1618 [11]

What was the most important document published in 1776? The Declaration of Independence is the easy answer for Americans, but many would argue that Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" had a bigger and more global impact.

On March 9, 1776, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (commonly referred to as simply "The Wealth of Nations") was first published. Smith, a Scottish philosopher by trade, wrote the book to upend the mercantilist system. Mercantilism held that wealth was fixed and finite and that the only way to prosper was to hoard gold and tariff products from abroad. According to this theory, this meant nations should sell their goods to other countries while buying nothing in return. Predictably, countries fell into rounds of retaliatory tariffs that choked off international trade. (For related reading, see: The Basics Of Tariffs And Trade Barriers.)

The Invisible Hand

The core of Smith's thesis was that humans' natural tendency toward self-interest (or in modern terms, looking out for yourself) results in prosperity. Smith argued that by giving everyone freedom to produce and exchange goods as they pleased (free trade) and opening the markets up to domestic and foreign competition, people's natural self-interest would promote greater prosperity than with stringent government regulations. Smith believed humans ultimately promote public interest through their everyday economic choices. “He (or she) generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention,” states Smith in “An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations” (1776). This free-market force became known as the invisible hand, but it needed support to bring about its magic.

What is the Effect of the Invisible Hand on the Government?

The automatic pricing and distribution mechanisms in the economy—which Adam Smith called an "invisible hand"—interacts directly and indirectly with centralized, top-down planning authorities. However, there are some meaningful conceptual fallacies in an argument that is framed as the invisible hand versus the government.

The invisible hand is not actually a distinguishable entity. Instead, it is the sum of many phenomena that occur when consumers and producers engage in commerce. Smith's insight into the idea of the invisible hand was one of the most important in the history of economics and remains one of the chief justifications for free market ideologies. The invisible hand theorem (at least in its modern interpretations) suggests that the means of production and distribution should be privately owned, and that if trade occurs unfettered by regulation, in turn, society will flourish organically. These arguments are naturally competitive with the concept and function of government.

The government is not serendipitous; it is prescriptive and intentional. Politicians, regulators and those who exercise legal force (such as the courts, police, and military) pursue defined goals through coercion. However, in contrast, macroeconomic forces—supply and demand, buying and selling, profit and loss occur voluntarily until government policy inhibits or overrides them. In this sense, it is more accurate to suggest that government affects the invisible hand, not the other way around.


8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a basic idea of the Magna Carta? a. Kings are exempt from the law. b. Most property belongs to the st
    11·1 answer
  • Where does the right to the ownership of private property originate, and which British common law recognized?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these religions did not practice in the mauryan empire?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these is NOT one of the“Five Basic Freedoms”?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the nazi party maintain its control of germany?
    5·1 answer
  • 100 PTS GIVEAWAY!!!!!!!<br><br> (and free brainliest)
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following works was constructed to keep barbarians out of China?
    10·1 answer
  • TRUE or FALSE: The Roman Empire expanded in response to political threats, economic opportunities, and some emperor's desire for
    8·2 answers
  • What is the Boxer Rebellion and how did it influence U.S. - China relations?
    15·1 answer
  • Why does the historian Edward Gibbon feel that Christianity was to blame for the decline of the Roman Empire?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!