Similar--both control economic resources and typically expect a market to rise out of the imperialism.
Difference--settler colonialism the people from the home country make a home in the new colony establishing political, social, and economic systems. In economic imperialism, only a few people from the home country may make a home in the imperial land but mostly the social structure is left alone and even the political structure is left untouched unless it is not kind to the home country. It is focused on resources and markets with businesses often owned by the home country.
That came from the English because the king agree to the claim of their negotiation is "a better path," but they seen to negotiation it doesn't work from Birmingham without tension."
<span>What was one impact of the printing revolution on european society?
the printing press<<</span>
The major difference between Leutchtenburg's and Interrante's interpretations of cities and rural areas during the 1920s was the geographical reorganization of rural and urban areas. The regions were drawn together and a more independent relationship between them. The relationship was evident in towns and cities which outlined difference around urban centres.
The towns attracted people from the surrounding countryside and central cities. Farm families which were converted to surrounding countryside were tied to urban culture and urban market. People habits of consumption were charged by shifting from direct production of goods to be purchasing them markets of metropolitan and this made women go to the marketplace and come out of the household.
I need the answers too because I’m taking a final right now:(
