Many countries reaped the benefits of the green revolution. India and China, for example, were threatened with famine due to their growing populations. The benefits of the green revolution for such countries as China and India are "countries no longer needed to fear famine thanks to new high-yield rice varieties." Option B. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a
green revolution?</h3>
Generally, a significant rise in agricultural output in developing nations as a result of the usage of synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, and high-yield crop types
In conclusion, The benefits of the green revolution for nations such as China and India include no longer having to dread starvation because of new high-yield rice varieties.
Read more about green revolution
brainly.com/question/12222646
#SPJ4
Answer:
The bank run occurred because the stock market crashed and investors wanted immediate access to their liquid cash. This was not possible because many banks had invested heavily in the stock market and were not required to keep large sums of money on hand. Nor were the deposits of investors insured, so much of the liquid cash was gone. This situation led to great instability in domestic and international markets
Explanation: The Great Depression witnessed the collapse of the capitalist system as we know it.
Answer:
I forgot the correct name for it but the first box is First Hand, and the second box is First Person.
Let me know if I'm wrong.
The correct answer is: D. They believed that representatives were better able to vote on national issues than ordinary citizens were.
Explanation
The excerpt contrasts ancient democracies, that were characterized by tyranny and run by mobs, to the idea of a large government representation so as to demostrate that whenevever a group of people is assembled, no matter who is in it, they tend to make the wrong decisions, that is, decisions led by passion instead of reason as stated in the excerpt:
"<em>passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason".</em>
Moreover, Federalists wanted a strong national government, instead of granting the power to the states, and believed that only one person could represent 30.000 people.
