Comparative advantage I would think. Yep, Google-sensei confirmed it:) Comparative advantage is the answer.
1. Hard work
2. no pay
3. barely any food
4. chances of being raped or beaten at any moment
Answer: Albeit the Founding Fathers never planned it to be like this, partisanship and a two party framework are critical pieces of US legislative issues since they take into consideration "groups to be shaped"- - groups that can more readily get across specific thoughts and party stages to general society.
Since there are just two significant gatherings, US residents feel that they just host a decision between one get-together or the other.
Since there are just two significant gatherings, the gatherings will in general differ enormously on many issues, taking possibly one outrageous side of the contention or the other.
On occasion, there have been endeavors to make a suitable outsider, yet these gatherings infrequently have sufficient help to be on an equivalent balance with the two fundamental gatherings.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "This action added strain on the economy." By shutting down southern ports, Confederate forces were affected by all of the following EXCEPT <span>This action added strain on the economy.</span>
