Answer:
Explanation:
1. Judicial activism is the interpretation of the Constitution to advocate contemporary values and conditions. Judicial restraint is limiting the powers of the judges to strike down a law.
2.In judicial restraint, the court should uphold all acts of the Congress and the state legislatures unless they are violating the Constitution of the country.
3.In the matter of judicial activism, the judges are required to use their power to correct any injustice especially when the other constitutional bodies are not acting.
4.Judicial activism has a great role in formulating social policies on issues like protection of rights of an individual, civil rights, public morality, and political unfairness.
Have fun passing that class I currently have three hours to do 25 assignments at the end of that three hours I will have my finals grade for all of my classes ahhh
Answer:
yes David committed a crime
Explanation:
because he had the chance to return the purse but he walked away with it
Answer:
It would be heard in a <em>Federal Court.</em>
Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a<em> Federal Court.</em>
<h3><em>
I hope this helped at all.</em></h3>