Answer: B
Explanation: Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.
Answer:
B. The court is authorized to hear the case and make a ruling after considering the arguments.
Explanation:
The jurisdiction in legal terms refers to the geographical coverage or reach of a case to be tried, heard, and decide on the matter. This means that cases of any legal matter are tried according to their jurisdictional situations.
In cases of a court that has jurisdiction over a legal dispute, the court is at the liberty to hear and decide on the matter. The court can hear the case and make a ruling after all arguments are presented. The jurisdiction allows the court to act on the case as it likes. This means that the court has the right to make any ruling regarding the case as it has jurisdiction over it.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Answer:
Well, The only specific evidence we have at the current scene would be that man that has a book of matches but sense we cant really determine whether or not he was the one who did it, therefore we have no exponential evidence that he did it.
Explanation:
So there cant be any loopholes to have legal crime
