Easy Way
100÷40=2.5 is exact middle of the integers so 20 integers are above 2.5 and 20 integers are below
22..21..20..19..18..17..16..15..14..13..12..11..10..9..8..7...6..5..4..3
2.5
2..1..0..-1..-2..-3..-4..-5..-6..-7..-8..-9..-10..-11..-12..-13..-14..-15..-16..-17..
This link will show you different equations
http://web2.0calc.com/questions/the-sum-of-40-consecutive-integers-is-100-what-is-the-smallest-of-these-40-integers
Answer:
At the end of the 2 year, the book value of the truck is $12,600
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
<u><em>Double declining balance method</em></u> is a form of an accelerated depreciation method in which the asset value is depreciated at twice the rate it is done in the straight-line method.
Step 1
Determine the straight-line depreciation rate
Divide the total cost by the number of years in the asset's useful life.
Step 2
Then, multiply that number by 2 and that is your Double-Declining Depreciation Rate
-----> is the depreciation for Year 1
Step 3
At the end of the first year, the book value of the truck is
Step 4
For Year 2, we will apply the same formula to the book value of the truck by the end of Year 1
-----> is the depreciation for Year 2
therefore
At the end of the 2 year, the book value of the truck is
24 people can sit at three tables lined in a row
Answer:
Explanation:
A circle whose center is and radius , has equation:
The center of circle is given as origin , therefore:
This circle passes , then the radius of circle is the distance between origin and
=>
Substitute , , and back into original equation:
or
Hope this helps!
:)
The correct option is D.
Option A. isn't even about quadrilater, so we can immediately discard it.
Option B. statement is true, but has nothing to do with the point of the question. In fact, it is true that every square is in particular a rectangle, but in turn every rectangle is a parallelogram. So, there's no counterexample here
Option C. is false, because a dart is a parallelogram: both of its opposite sides are parallel.
Option D. finally presents a counterexample. In fact, The two bases of a trapezoid are parallel, but the two other sides are not. So, a trapezoid is not a parallelogram, even though it has a pair of parallel sides. This is way, in order to be a parallelogram, it is necessary for the quadrilateral to have two pairs of parallel sides.